Reducing Gadolinium Exposure in Patients Undergoing Monitoring for Meningiomas.

Background Due to the non-malignant and slow-growing nature of many meningiomas, surveillance with serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) serves as an acceptable management plan. However, repeated imaging with gold-standard contrast-based studies may lead to contrast-associated adverse effects. Non-gadolinium T2 sequences may serve as a suitable alternative without the risk of adverse effects of contrast. Thus, this study sought to investigate the agreement between post-contrast T1 and non-gadolinium T2 MRI sequences in the measurement of meningioma growth. Methodology The Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine (VCU SOM) brain tumor database was used to create a cohort of meningioma patients and determine the number of patients who had T1 post-contrast imaging accompanied by readily measurable imaging from either T2 fast spin echo (FSE) or T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences. Measurements of the largest axial and perpendicular diameters of each tumor were conducted by two independent observers using T1 post-contrast, T2 FSE, and T2 FLAIR imaging series. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was calculated to assess inter-rater reliability between observers and agreement between measurements of tumor diameter among the different imaging sequences. Results In total, 33 patients (average age = 72.1 ± 12.9 years, 90% female) with meningiomas were extracted from our database, with 22 (66.7%) undergoing T1 post-contrast imaging accompanied with readily measurable imaging from T2 FSE and/or T2 FLAIR sequences. The inter-rater reliability between the measurements of T1 axial and perpendicular diameters was 0.96 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.92-0.98) and 0.92 (95% CI = 0.83-0.97), respectively. The inter-rater reliability between the measurements of T2 axial perpendicular diameters was 0.93 (95% = CI 0.92-0.97) and 0.89 (95% CI = 0.74-0.95), respectively. The agreements between the measurement of T1 and T2 FSE axial diameter by each observer were 0.97 (95% CI = 0.93-0.98) and 0.92 (95% CI = 0.81-0.97). The agreements between the measurements of T1 and T2 FSE perpendicular diameter measurements by each observer were 0.98 (95% CI = 0.95-0.99) and 0.88 (95% CI = 0.73-0.95). Conclusions Two-thirds of our patients had meningiomas that were readily measurable on either T2 FSE or T2 FLAIR sequences. Additionally, there was excellent inter-rater reliability between the observers in our study as well as an agreement between individual measurements of T1 post-contrast and T2 FSE tumor diameters. These findings suggest that T2 FSE may serve as a safe and similarly effective surveillance method for the long-term management of meningioma patients.