Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM
VIPCreated with Sketch.

Evaluation of four laboratory-based high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 automated antigen tests compared to RT-PCR on nasal and oropharyngeal samples.

Thomas Daell Leineweber,Khaled Ghathian,Jan Gorm Lisby,Lennart Friis-Hansen,Shoaib Afzal,Svend Ellermann-Eriksen, Chih Man German Ma,Arieh S Cohen,Rikke Lind Jørgensen,Matilde Bøgelund Hansen,Pia Rørbæk Kamstrup,Helene Larsen,Nina Steenhard,Christel Barker Jensen, Thomas Kallemose, Maria Wendelboe Forsberg,Nikolai Søren Kirkby,Uffe Vest Schneider

Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology（2023）

Cited 1|Views20
No score
Abstract
All AATs were highly specific for detection of SARS-CoV-2. Three of the four AATs were significantly more sensitive than the fourth AAT both in terms of analytical and clinical sensitivity. Anatomical test location significantly influenced the clinical sensitivity of AATs.
More
Translated text
Key words
antigen tests,oropharyngeal samples,laboratory-based,high-throughput,sars-cov,rt-pcr
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined