Point-Counterpoint: Gleason Score 6/Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer Should Be Renamed as "Non-cancer" to Improve Public Health: A Wrong Idea From a Pathologist's Perspective

No AccessJournal of UrologyPoint of View1 May 2023Point/Counterpoint: Gleason Score 6/Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer Should Renamed as “Non-cancer” to Improve Public Health—A Wrong Idea From a Pathologist’s Perspective Rajal B. Shah Rajal B. ShahRajal B. Shah *Correspondence: Dr. Charles T. Ashworth Professor of Pathology, Department of Pathology, Clements University Hospital, UH4.449 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390 (telephone: 214-633-6434; FAX: 214-633-8817; email: E-mail Address: [email protected]). https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0820-6823 Department of Pathology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003510AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Rajal B. Shah Department of Pathology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas *Correspondence: Dr. Charles T. Ashworth Professor of Pathology, Department of Pathology, Clements University Hospital, UH4.449 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390 (telephone: 214-633-6434; FAX: 214-633-8817; email: E-mail Address: [email protected]). More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...