Comparison Between Gravimetry and Radiometry Results: Alto do Sobrido-Ribeiro da Serra Case Study

<p>The Alto do Sobrido (AS) and Ribeiro da Serra (RS) Mines are old Sb-Au explorations. These are located in Gondomar, Portugal, on the inverse limb of the well-known structure called Valongo Anticline. In the AS Mine, the mineralization occurs near the contact between the Schist-Greywacke Complex (CXG) (Precambrian and/or Cambrian(?)) and the breccia of the base of the Carboniferous. In the RS Mine, the mineralization occurs only on the CXG. In both mines, the Sb-Au mineralization occurs in quartz veins and some stockworks.</p><p>A spatial correlation between the Sb-Au mineralization and the post-orogenic granites occurs in the D&#250;rico-Beir&#227; Region according to Gumiel & Arribas (1987). Couto et al. (2007) also acquired data that suggests a genetic connection between this mineralization and non-outcropping granites. These granites may have been the source of fluids and a heat source that improved hydrothermal circulation and they have been observed in one of the RS Mine&#8217;s galleries.</p><p>With this hypothesis in mind, we intend to compare the data from a radiometric survey, which is a method that is radiometrically sensitive to K, Th and U at the near-surface, to the data from a gravimetric survey, which is a method that is sensitive to density anomalies at greater depths, in order to show if these granites could have chemically influenced its embedding rocks.</p><p>To make this comparison, we used the residual anomaly map from our gravimetric survey and the four maps obtained in the radiometric survey (total concentrations, K, eTh and eU). Firstly, we normalized all the grid maps to obtain grids with values between -1 and 1. Once this was complete, we multiplied each of the four radiometry maps to the residual anomaly map, obtaining the comparison maps.</p><p>On the resulting maps, we can observe high values in 3 different areas. The first corresponds to a lower value of gravimetric anomaly and a lower value of concentrations of all the elements. This area is located where the hypothesized non-outcropping granites are situated. The second area corresponds to high values on both methods. This matches the location of the lithologies from the Middle Ordovician to the Carboniferous, which are rocks of higher densities and higher concentration values of K, eTh and eU. The third area consists of lower gravimetric anomalies and lower concentrations of K and eU, and coincides with the location of the Ordovician quartzites. This area isn&#8217;t as visible on the eTh map, which is consistent with what was observed on the field.</p><p>We consider this approach to be a practical method to correlate the results of these two methods and an attempt to understand how the granite located at depth could have influenced these lithologies that today outcrop.</p><p><strong>References</strong></p><p>Gumiel, P., Arribas, A., 1987. Antimony Deposits in the Iberian Peninsula. Economic Geology, Volume 82, pp 1453-1463.</p><p>Couto, H., Borges, F. S., Roger, G., 2007. Late Palaeozoic orogenic gold-antimony deposits from the D&#250;rico-Beir&#227; area (North Portugal) and their relation with hidden granitic apexes. Ninth Biennial SGA Meeting, Dublin. pp 609-612.</p>