Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

Heat-death by volcano - how Venus went rogue?

Michael Way,Richard Ernst, Jeffrey Scargle

crossref(2022)

Cited 0|Views2
No score
Abstract
The idea of a habitable Venus epoch has gained traction in recent years via 1-D and 3-D General Circulation Modeling (GCM) efforts [1,2,3]. Although recent work has supported an alternative permanent hot and dry scenario [4]. However, the habitable scenario presents us with a conundrum - how does a terrestrial planet transform from temperate to hot-house? For decades it was proposed that the gradual brightening of the sun was the probable cause [5]. Yet 4 billion years ago Venus was receiving nearly 1.4 times the insolation that Earth receives today, and many studies have put Earth at the inner boundary of the habitable zone today [6]. The newer 3-D GCM efforts have demonstrated that if Venus had an early habitable period, that the cloud-albedo feedback responsible for maintaining temperate surface conditions [7] could still be in operation today. From this perspective increasing insolation through time cannot be an answer to the transition from habitable to hot-house. We propose that the 'Great Climate Transition' (GCT) was trigged by simultaneous large igneous provinces (LIPs) akin to those like the Siberian Traps responsible for the End Permian [8]. We have taken the most up to date LIP database for Earth [9] and characterized their distribution through time as random or nearly random. Next we initiate a large suite of Monte Carlo simulations based on this record and generate the likelihood for simultaneous, or environmentally overlapping events in this hypothetical setup. We find the probability of such events to be quite high, a probable cause for Venus' GCT, and a possible harbinger of things to come for Earth.[1] Grinspoon, D.H. & Bullock, M.A. (2007) AGU https://doi.org/10.1029/176GM12[2] Way, M. J. et al. (2016) GRL 43, 8376–8383[3] Way, M. J. and Del Genio, A D. (2020) JGR Planets 125, e2019JE006276[4] Turbet et al. (2021) Nature,598,276 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03873-w[5] Kasting J. F., Pollack J. B. and Ackerman T. P. (1983) Icarus, 57, 335-355[6] Kopparapu, R.K. et al. (2013) ApJ 765, 131[7] Yang, J. et al. (2014) ApJ 707, L2[8] Wignall, P. (2001) Earth Science Reviews, 53 (1-2), 1-33[9] Ernst R. E. et al. (2021) AGU Geophys. Mon. 255, pp. 3-26
More
Translated text
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined