South Atlantic deep-sea temperature evolution across the Pliocene-Pleistocene from clumped isotope thermometry

<p>The deep ocean comprises a large and relatively stable heat reservoir in the climate system. Hence deep sea temperature (DST) records constitute an important pillar of knowledge in the study of past climate states. Furthermore, a promising link exists between DSTs and global mean surface temperatures (GMSTs) [1]. DST reconstructions are nevertheless hampered by idealistic assumptions surrounding the interpretation of widely-used proxies like the ratio of oxygen isotopes on benthic foraminifera (&#948;¹⁸O_b). One such uncertain variable key in the analysis of &#948;¹⁸O_b is the isotopic composition of paleo-seawater (&#948;¹⁸O_sw). Deconvolving this signal into temperature and ice-volume components across the last 5 Ma is non-trivial. Attempts to resolve it have often relied on independent temperature constraints from foraminiferal Mg/Ca ratios that also involve added uncertainties regarding variations in ocean chemistry through time, as well as the need for species-specific calibrations.</p> <p>Carbonate clumped isotope thermometry (&#916;47) can aid in overcoming these limitations since it is based on thermodynamic principles that govern the abundance of ¹³C-¹⁸O bonds within the crystal lattice, therefore granting it independence from estimations surrounding the composition of the precipitating fluid [2]. Recent clumped isotope DST records of the Eocene [3] and the Miocene [4] reveal significantly warmer ocean temperatures than traditionally accepted [5], suggesting a re-evaluation of the interpretation of &#948;¹⁸O_b records in the geological past.</p> <p>Here we present &#916;47-based DST constraints of the last 5 Ma obtained from benthic foraminifera of ODP Site 1264 in the South Atlantic Ocean. Reconstructions covering the Pliocene-Pleistocene transition shed light on the global climatic change that followed the mid-Pliocene warm period and culminated in full glaciation of the Northern Hemisphere. In particular, our Pliocene DST data lies in closer agreement with recent GMSTs estimations [6] than &#948;¹⁸O_b-based DST would imply.</p> <p>&#160;</p> <p>[1] Valdes, P. J., et al. (2021). Climate of the Past, 17(4), 1483-1506.</p> <p>[2] Eiler, J.M. (2007), Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 262, 309-327.</p> <p>[3] Agterhuis, T., et al. (2022), Commun Earth Environ 3, 39</p> <p>[4] Modestou, S. E., et al. (2020) Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology 35, e2020PA003927.</p> <p>[5] Westerhold, T., et al. (2020), Science, 369, 1383&#8211;1387</p> <p>[6] McClymont, E. L., et al. (2020) Climate of the Past, 16(4), 1599-1615.</p>