Aseismic slip behavior along the central section of the North Anatolian Fault: insights from geodetic observations. 

<p>Recent observations suggest seismogenic faults release elastic energy through a wide variety of slip modes covering a spectrum from sudden rapid earthquakes to slow aseismic slip. Aseismic slip releases energy very slowly without radiating seismic waves and plays an important role in the initiation, propagation, and arrest of large earthquakes. Aseismic slip is thought to be influenced by the presence/migration of fluids, stress interactions through fault geometrical complexities, and/or fault material heterogeneities. Descriptions of occurrences of aseismic slip at the surface and depth are hence required to feed into models and eventually characterize the factors controlling the occurrence of slow, aseismic versus rapid, seismic fault slip.</p> <p>We focus on the central segment of the North Anatolian Fault, which has been creeping since at least the 1950s. This region was struck by the Mw 7.3 Bolu/Gerede earthquake in 1944, and since then, no earthquake of magnitude greater than 6 has been recorded. During the 1960s, aseismic slip was discovered as a wall built across the fault in 1957 was being slowly offset. Geodetic studies (InSAR, GNSS, and creepmeters) focused on capturing and analyzing aseismic slip around the village of Ismetpasa. Creepmeter measurements during the 1980s and 2010s, along with InSAR time series analysis, suggest that aseismic slip occurs episodically rather than persistently.</p> <p>We use Sentinel-1 time series and GNSS data to provide a spatio-temporal description of the kinematics of fault slip. We show that aseismic slip observed at the surface is coincident with a shallow locking depth and that slow slip events with a return period of 2.5 years are restricted to a specific section of the fault. We contrast such results with GNSS time series analysis of a local network, confirming our findings. In addition, we discuss the potential rheological implications of our results, proposing a simple alternative model to explain the local occurrence of shallow aseismic slip at this location.</p>