C-band Sentinel-1 data for estimating the basal crop coefficient and evapotranspiration of winter wheat  

crossref(2023)

引用 0|浏览3
暂无评分
摘要
<p>Estimating crop evapotranspiration (ETc) is of primary importance for irrigation management. The model commonly used for this purpose is the FAO-56 approach which consists of accurately estimating the basal crop coefficient K<sub>cb</sub>. Historically, K<sub>cb</sub> is derived from optical indices such as NDVI giving its sensitivity to vegetation cover fraction and to the Leaf Area Index. Nevertheless, optical data are disturbed by the presence of clouds. In this context, the objective of this work is to investigate the potential use of all-weather radar data as a substitute of NDVI to derive K<sub>cb</sub>. The study is conducted over two winter wheat fields (Field 1 and Field 2) in Morocco, monitored during two agricultural seasons 2016-2017 and 2017-2018. Each field is equipped with an eddy covariance station allowing the estimation of ETc every 30 minutes. In addition, a weather station was installed over an alfalfa plot near the study fields. First, the backscattering coefficient and the interferometric coherence ( &#961; at VV polarization) are derived from Sentinel-1 data with a 6-day revisit time and a spatial resolution of 10 m. Second, empirical relationships have between established between K<sub>cb</sub>, on one hand, and the interferometric coherence and the polarization ratio, on the other hand and the results are also compared to the classical K<sub>cb</sub>-NDVI (derived from Sentinel-2) method. The results show that good statistical metrics are obtained between K<sub>cb</sub> and NDVI (R=0.77 and RMSE=0.14 for Field 1). Similar results are obtained also using &#961; (R=0.76, RMSE=0.18). Finally, the K<sub>cb</sub> is estimated from the calibrated relationships on one season and then used to estimate ET<sub>c</sub>. The results demonstrate reasonable estimates of ET<sub>c</sub> on Field 1 (R=0.70, RMSE=0.75 mm/day and bias=-0.18 mm/days) using K<sub>cb</sub>-&#961;. By contrast, a significant overestimations is highlighted both with &#160;(bias=0.73 mm/day) and NDVI (bias=1.46 mm/day) over Field 2. Interestingly, the K<sub>cb</sub>-&#961; relationship is more consistent in the estimation of ET<sub>c</sub> when changing from one field to another. These outcomes open new perspectives for the estimation of ET<sub>c</sub> from radar data as a potential substitute of NDVI in case of persistent cloud cover.</p>
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要