Response to Merritts et al. (2023): The Anthropocene is complex. Defining it is not

Merritts et al. (2023) misrepresent Paul Crutzen's Anthropocene concept as encompassing all significant anthropogenic impacts, extending back many millennia. Crutzen's definition reflects massively enhanced, much more recent human impacts that transformed the Earth System away from the stability of Holocene conditions. His concept of an epoch (hence the 'cene' suffix) is more consistent with the strikingly distinct sedimentary record accumulated since the mid-20th century. Waters et al. (2022) highlighted a Great Acceleration Event Array (GAEA) of stratigraphic event markers that are indeed diverse and complex but also tightly clustered around 1950 CE, allowing ultra-high resolution characterization and correlation of a clearly recognisable Anthropocene chronostratigraphic base. The 'Anthropocene event' offered by Merritts et al., following Gibbard et al. (2021, 2022), is a highly nuanced concept that obfuscates the transformative human impact of the chro-nostratigraphic Anthropocene. Waters et al. (2022) restricted the meaning of the term 'event' in geology to conform with usual Quaternary practice and improve its utility. They simultaneously recognized an evidence -based Anthropogenic Modification Episode that is more explicitly defined than the highly interpretive interdis-ciplinary 'Anthropocene event' of Gibbard et al. (2021, 2022). The advance of science is best served through clearly developed concepts supported by tightly circumscribed terminology; indeed, improvements to stratig-raphy over recent decades have been achieved through increasingly precise definitions, especially for chro-nostratigraphic units, and not by retaining vague terminology.