Investigating survival, quality of life and cognition in PROton versus photon therapy forIDH-mutated diffuse grade 2 and 3 GLIOmas (PRO-GLIO): a randomised controlled trial in Norway and Sweden

Liv Cathrine Heggebø, Ida Maria Henriksen Borgen, Hillevi Rylander,Cecilie Kiserud,Tonje Haug Nordenmark, Taran Paulsen Hellebust,Morten Egeberg Evensen, Magnus Gustavsson,Christina Ramberg,Mette Sprauten,Henriette Magelssen, Hanne Blakstad, Janani Moorthy, Karin Andersson, Ingela Raunert,Thomas Henry, Cecilie Moe, Carin Granlund,Dorota Goplen, Jorunn Brekke,Tor-Christian Aase Johannessen,Tora Skeidsvoll Solheim,Kirsten Marienhagen, Øyvind Humberset,Per Bergström,Måns Agrup, Ludvig Dahl, Michael Gubanski, Helene Gojon, Carl-Johan Brahme,Isabelle Rydén, Asgeir S Jakola,Einar O Vik-Mo,Hanne C. Lie, Lars Asphaug, Maziar Hervani,Ingrid Kristensen,Corina Silvia Rueegg, Inge C Olsen, Rolf J Ledal, Eskil Degsell,Katja Werlenius,Malin Blomstrand,Petter Brandal

BMJ Open(2023)

引用 0|浏览5
暂无评分
摘要
IntroductionThe use of proton therapy increases globally despite a lack of randomised controlled trials demonstrating its efficacy and safety. Proton therapy enables sparing of non-neoplastic tissue from radiation. This is principally beneficial and holds promise of reduced long-term side effects. However, the sparing of seemingly non-cancerous tissue is not necessarily positive for isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutated diffuse gliomas grade 2–3, which have a diffuse growth pattern. With their relatively good prognosis, yet incurable nature, therapy needs to be delicately balanced to achieve a maximal survival benefit combined with an optimised quality of life.Methods and analysisPRO-GLIO (PROton versus photon therapy inIDH-mutated diffuse grade 2 and 3 GLIOmas) is an open-label, multicentre, randomised phase III non-inferiority study. 224 patients aged 18–65 years withIDH-mutated diffuse gliomas grade 2–3 from Norway and Sweden will be randomised 1:1 to radiotherapy delivered with protons (experimental arm) or photons (standard arm). First intervention-free survival at 2 years is the primary endpoint. Key secondary endpoints are fatigue and cognitive impairment, both at 2 years. Additional secondary outcomes include several survival measures, health-related quality of life parameters and health economy endpoints.Ethics and disseminationTo implement proton therapy as part of standard of care for patients withIDH-mutated diffuse gliomas grade 2–3, it should be deemed safe. With its randomised controlled design testing proton versus photon therapy, PRO-GLIO will provide important information for this patient population concerning safety, cognition, fatigue and other quality of life parameters. As proton therapy is considerably more costly than its photon counterpart, cost-effectiveness will also be evaluated. PRO-GLIO is approved by ethical committees in Norway (Regional Committee for Medical & Health Research Ethics) and Sweden (The Swedish Ethical Review Authority) and patient inclusion has commenced. Trial results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals, relevant conferences, national and international meetings and expert forums.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT05190172).
更多
查看译文
关键词
photon therapy,gliomas,proton,pro-glio
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要