Variability of contribution of 1,25 (OH)2D3 (vitamin D) level to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation outcome.

BACKGROUND:The impact of vitamin D status on the outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has recently been the focus of interest with a lot of controversy. In this study we aimed to evaluate the impact of pre-transplant vit. D level on the outcome of HSCT. METHODS:In this study, we evaluated the impact of vitamin D level on the risk of development of graft versus host disease (GVHD) and survival after HSCT. The study included 97 patients who received allogeneic HSCT from an identical sibling. Serum vitamin D level was measured before conditioning using ELIZA. Student t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, ANOVA F-test and Kruskal-Wallis H tests were used to determine significance of difference for quantitative data. Pearson correlation, Spearman correlation and Chi-square test were used to determine correlations and associations. Kaplan-Meier and Log rank (Mantel-Cox) tests were used for analysis of survival. P value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS:Vitamin D level showed a range of 18.24-84.6 with a mean of 38.14 ± 9.73 and a median of 36.26 ng/ml. Two patients had vitamin D level <20 and 17 had a level <30 ng/ml. Acute GVHD occurred in 33 (34 %) and chronic GVHD in 29 (29.9 %) patients. Vitamin D level had no impact on frequency or severity of GVHD; either did it impact survival. This might be attributable to the relatively normal level in the majority of our patients on account of the sunny weather of Egypt. This might also be a potential explanation for the inconsistency of the different studies with variable levels of vitamin D. CONCLUSIONS:The current study failed to demonstrate an impact of pre-transplant vitamin D level on the outcome of HSCT. This might be attributed to the low prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in our population on account of our almost always sunny weather. The marked variability in the level of vitamin D that is considered sufficient interferes with objective comparison between studies; a consensus on what is considered sufficient, insufficient, or deficient is essential.