An evaluation of reporting guidelines and Clinical Trial Registry requirements among anesthesiology journals.

Journal of Evidence-Based MedicineEarly View LETTER An evaluation of reporting guidelines and Clinical Trial Registry requirements among anesthesiology journals Chase Ladd, Corresponding Author Chase Ladd [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0003-3789-7299 Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma Correspondence Chase Ladd, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK 74107. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorMary C. Greenough, Mary C. Greenough Office of Medical Student Research, The University of Oklahoma—Tulsa School of Community Medicine, Tulsa, Oklahoma, United StatesSearch for more papers by this authorArjun K. Reddy, Arjun K. Reddy Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OklahomaSearch for more papers by this authorElizabeth Garrett, Elizabeth Garrett Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OklahomaSearch for more papers by this authorAlyssa Peterson, Alyssa Peterson Office of Medical Student Research, The University of Oklahoma—Tulsa School of Community Medicine, Tulsa, Oklahoma, United StatesSearch for more papers by this authorAaron Pierce, Aaron Pierce Department of Anesthesiology, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OklahomaSearch for more papers by this authorDavid Wenger, David Wenger Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OklahomaSearch for more papers by this authorMichael Moore, Michael Moore Department of Anesthesiology, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OklahomaSearch for more papers by this authorMatt Vassar, Matt Vassar Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OklahomaSearch for more papers by this author Chase Ladd, Corresponding Author Chase Ladd [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0003-3789-7299 Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma Correspondence Chase Ladd, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK 74107. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorMary C. Greenough, Mary C. Greenough Office of Medical Student Research, The University of Oklahoma—Tulsa School of Community Medicine, Tulsa, Oklahoma, United StatesSearch for more papers by this authorArjun K. Reddy, Arjun K. Reddy Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OklahomaSearch for more papers by this authorElizabeth Garrett, Elizabeth Garrett Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OklahomaSearch for more papers by this authorAlyssa Peterson, Alyssa Peterson Office of Medical Student Research, The University of Oklahoma—Tulsa School of Community Medicine, Tulsa, Oklahoma, United StatesSearch for more papers by this authorAaron Pierce, Aaron Pierce Department of Anesthesiology, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OklahomaSearch for more papers by this authorDavid Wenger, David Wenger Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OklahomaSearch for more papers by this authorMichael Moore, Michael Moore Department of Anesthesiology, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OklahomaSearch for more papers by this authorMatt Vassar, Matt Vassar Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OklahomaSearch for more papers by this author First published: 27 April 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12533Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL REFERENCES 1Kissin I. High-impact clinical studies that fomented new developments in anesthesia: history of achievements, 1966–2015. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2021; 15: 2495– 2505. 2Altman DG. Better reporting of randomized controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. BMJ. 1996; 313(7057), 570– 571. 3Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA. 1996; 276(8), 637– 639. 4Turner L, Shamseer L, Altman DG, et al. Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 11(11), MR000030. 5Nagendran M, Harding D, Teo W, et al. Poor adherence of randomized trials in surgery to CONSORT guidelines for non-pharmacological treatments (NPT): a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2013; 3(12), e003898. 6Münter NH, Stevanovic A, Rossaint R, Stoppe C, Sanders RD, Coburn M. CONSORT item adherence in top ranked anaesthesiology journals in 2011: a retrospective analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015; 32(2), 117– 125. 7Elliott L, Coulman K, Blencowe NS, et al. A systematic review of reporting quality for anaesthetic interventions in randomized controlled trials. Anaesthesia. 2021; 76(6), 832– 836. 8 SAMPL guidelines for statistical reporting. Accessed February 27, 2023. https://www.equator-network.org/2013/02/11/sampl-guidelines-for-statistical-reporting/ 9Checketts JX, Sims MT, Detweiler B, Middlemist K, Jones J, Vassar M. An evaluation of reporting guidelines and Clinical Trial Registry requirements among orthopaedic surgery journals. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018; 100(3), e15. 10Egger M, Jüni P, Bartlett C. CONSORT Group (Consolidated Standards of Reporting of Trials). Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2001; 285(15), 1996– 1999. 11Available from: Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Higgins J, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from https://www.cochrane-handbook.org 12Greenfield M, Mhyre JM, Mashour GA, Blum JM, Yen EC, Rosenberg AL. Improvement in the quality of randomized controlled trials among general anesthesiology journals 2000 to 2006: a 6-year follow-up. Anesth Analg. 2009; 108(6), 1916– 1921. 13Checketts JX, Cook C, Imani S, Duckett L, Vassar M. An evaluation of reporting guidelines and Clinical Trial Registry requirements among plastic surgery journals. Ann Plast Surg. 2018; 81(2), 215– 219. Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue This article also appears in:Guideline and Policy-making ReferencesRelatedInformation