Spin and fragility in randomised controlled trials in the anaesthesia literature: a systematic review.

British journal of anaesthesia(2023)

引用 3|浏览7
暂无评分
摘要
This systematic review showed that 40% of statistically negative trials in high-impact anaesthesia journals could mislead readers. For statistically positive RCTs, the results relied on few subjects, with a median fragility index of 4 [1-8]. Efforts must be continued to reduce spin and fragility in the medical literature.
更多
查看译文
关键词
anaesthesia,fragility index,misleading reporting,quality of literature,reproducibility,spin,systematic review
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要