The impact of a home-based personalized computerized training program on cognitive dysfunction associated with Long COVID: a before-and-after feasibility study

Background Long COVID—also known as post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 or PASC—is a systemic syndrome affecting a large number of persons in the aftermath of the pandemic. Cognitive dysfunction (or brain fog) is one of its most common manifestations of PACS, and there are no effective interventions to mitigate it. Home-based personalized computerized cognitive training (CCT), which has shown effectiveness to improve other conditions, could offer hope to relieve the cognitive dysfunction in people with a previous history of COVID-19. Objective To evaluate the feasibility and potential benefit of a personalized CCT intervention to improve cognitive function among people living with PACS. Methods Adult individuals who self-reported cognitive dysfunction more than 3 months after a diagnosis of COVID-19 were recruited through an online platform designed for the study. Those who were eligible assessed their general cognitive function before completing as many cognitive daily training sessions as they wished during an 8-week period, using a personalized CCT application at home. The sessions included gamified tasks that tapped into five cognitive domains (attention, coordination, memory, perception and reasoning) and were tailored to the specific cognitive strengths and weaknesses detected at each point. At the end of this period, participants repeated the general cognitive function assessment. The differences between the scores at 8 weeks and baseline was the main outcome, complemented with analyses of the changes based on the participants’ age, training time, self-reported health level at baseline and time since the initial COVID-19 infection. Participants’ cognitive assessment scores were also computed in terms of percentiles according to the normative database of the test, considering their corresponding age- and gender-based reference sample. Results The participants had significant cognitive dysfunction at baseline, even though 80% of them had had the initial episode of COVID-19 more than a year before enrolling in the study. Eighty nine percent reported negative levels of self-reported health at baseline. On average, 51 training sessions (range: 10 to 251) were completed over a mean time of 435 minutes (range 78 to 2448). Most of the participants obtained higher scores after CCT in each of the domains as compared with baseline (attention: 81% of the sample; memory: 86%; coordination: 82%; perception: 88%; reasoning: 77%). The magnitude of the score increase at post-test was high across domains (attention: 31% of change; memory: 37%; coordination: 52%; perception: 42%; reasoning: 26%). Following CCT, there were also improvements in the percentile data in all the domains (attention: 14 points; memory: 18 points; coordination: 18 points; perception: 17 points; reasoning: 11 points). Conclusions This study suggests that a self-administered CCT based on gamified cognitive tasks could be an effective way to ameliorate cognitive dysfunction in persons with PASC. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. ### Funding Statement This research was partially funded by the BBVA Foundation (JAD) and by the Comunidad de Madrid (JAD), both in Spain, and by resources available to the authors. ### Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: The Ethics Committee of Universidad Nebrija, Madrid, Spain, gave ethical approval for this work. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable. Yes All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors