ShockModes: A Multimodal Model for Prognosticating Intensive Care Outcomes from Physician Notes and Vitals
medrxiv(2022)
Abstract
Objective Shock Index (SI) is widely used for prognosticating outcomes in ICU and emergency settings. We aimed to create a multi-modal early warning system (EWS) for development of abnormal shock index using routinely available vitals and clinical notes.
Material and Methods 17,294 ICU-stays in MIMIC-III data were scored for SI. A new episode of abnormal SI was defined as SI > 0.7 for >30 minutes AND preceded by >=24 hours of normal SI. ICU stays with <24 hours admission, or SI >0.7 within the first 24 hours of admission, or missing SI in >50% in the 24 hour early warning window were excluded, leaving a final cohort of 337 normal and 84 abnormal SI instances. 3117 features from vitals time-series combined with BERT-based features from clinical notes were used to train a battery of machine learning models. The best multimodal pipeline ( ShockModes ) was assessed for interpretability using SHAP features.
Results Vitals-based, notes-based and multi-modal classifiers achieved the best sensitivity of 0.81, 0.81, and 0.83 with corresponding specificity of 0.92, 0.99, and 0.94 respectively, thus demonstrating the potential of ShockModes for early detection, while preventing false alarms. Global SHAP values revealed Fourier-features of heart rate and heparin sodium prophylaxis as top features. Sensitivity of early detection was highest in acute respiratory failure and chronic kidney disease patients.
Conclusion The multimodal, interpretable early warning system ShockModes can be used for prognosticating SI based outcomes in ICU and emergency settings.
### Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
### Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
### Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study used MIMIC-III dataset publicly available at http://physionet.org/. MIMIC-III datasets are de-identified and available for analysis as per the approval by MIT institutional review boards (IRBs) documented on the website.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data is available on reasonable request to the corresponding author.
MoreTranslated text
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
![](https://originalfileserver.aminer.cn/sys/aminer/pubs/mrt_preview.jpeg)
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined