The Reliability of the Resuscitation Assessment Tool (RAT) in Assessing Emergency Medicine Resident Competence in Pediatric Resuscitation Scenarios: A Prospective Observational Pilot Study

Introduction Emergency medicine (EM) postgraduate medical education in Canada has transitioned from traditional timebased training to competency -based medical education (CBME). In order to promote residents through stages of training, simulated assessments are needed to evaluate residents in high -stakes but low -frequency medical emergencies. There remains a gap in the literature pertaining to the use of evaluative tools in simulation, such as the Resuscitation Assessment Tool (RAT) in the new CBME curriculum design. Methods We completed a pilot study of resident physicians in one Canadian EM training program to evaluate the effectiveness and reliability of a simulation -based RAT for pediatric resuscitation. We recorded 10 EM trainees completing simulated scenarios and had nine EM physicians use the RAT tool to evaluate their performances. Generalizability theory was used to evaluate the reliability of the RAT tool. Results The mean RAT score for the management of pediatric myocarditis, cardiac arrest, and septic shock (appendicitis) across raters was 3.70, 3.73, and 4.50, respectively. The overall generalizability coefficient for testing simulated pediatric performance competency was 0.77 for internal consistency and 0.75 for absolute agreement. The performance of senior participants was superior to that of junior participants in the management of pediatric myocarditis (p = 0.01) but not statistically significant in the management of pediatric septic shock (p=0.77) or cardiac arrest (p =0.61). Conclusion Overall, our findings suggest that with an appropriately chosen simulated scenario, the RAT tool can be used effectively for the simulation of high -stakes and low -frequency scenarios for practice to enhance the new CBME curriculum in emergency medicine training programs.