Interpretation Method for Lost Gas in Deep Coalbed and Its Application

The gas loss time during the deep coalbed coring process is long. The measured desorption curve does not meet the application conditions for the classical United States Bureau of Mines (USBM) method. However, the industry still lacks a reliable interpretation method, which affects identifying deep coalbed methane reserves and optimizing sweet spots. (Method) The classical double-porosity and double-permeability theoretical model was adopted, and the influence of reservoir permeability, water saturation, and temperature on gas output in the coalbed desorption process was considered. Based on the measured field desorption data of the P1 sample of the No. 8 coal in the Benxi Formation on the eastern margin of Ordos, the entire process for the deep coalbed gas content test was numerically simulated. (Results) The simulation results show that the lost gas in the P1 sample accounts for 24.7% of the total gas, reaching 8.64 m(3)/t, including 18.81% of loss in wellbore lifting and 5.88% of loss during surface exposure. The total gas content of the sample is 35.34 m(3)/t. The P1 sample contains free gas, with a content of 9.71 m(3)/t, and the ratio between adsorbed and free gas is close to 7:3. Matrix permeability, initial gas saturation, and lifting time are the key factors that determine the amount of lost gas. The results of deep coalbed gas loss calculated by the USBM method were excessively large, approximately twice that calculated using the new method. The total gas content calculated based on multiple parameters is consistent with the interpretation results of the new method, with an average error of approximately 7%. (Conclusion) The interpretation method of gas loss in deep coalbeds has acceptable reliability and can be applied in shale gas content testing.