[Implementation of an electronic clinical decision aid to support quality of care for COPD in family medicine].

BACKGROUND:Electronic clinical decision aids (eCDAs) have the potential to improve the quality of chronic disease management (CDM) and, therefore, patient relevant outcomes. However, eCDAs are only sparsely implemented in primary care for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim of this pilot study was to develop and implement of an eCDA for COPD primary care in two Swiss primary care practices. METHOD:Two primary care practices, each with five primary care physicians and their assistants, participated in the study. The eCDA was developed in collaboration with one of the two GP practices (Practice 1) following a development cycle encompassing alpha- and beta-testing stages. Long-term testing for one year was conducted in both practices. The implementation of the eCDA was evaluated according to the RE-AIM framework counting occurrences as follows: Reach: the number of patients included in the CDM using the eCDA. EFFECTIVENESS:the number of treatment processes initiated per patient. Adoption: practice utilization of the diverse functions featured in the eCDA. Implementation and Maintenance: health care professionals' attitudes towards the impact of the eCDA on the quality of care and their willingness to continue using the eCDA after long-term testing. Data were collected by the eCDA itself, which was programmed to track user data, and from practice staff using questionnaires. RESULTS:Reach: After the long-term test, the number of patients recorded in the eCDA was 28 in practice 1, and 12 in practice 2. EFFECTIVENESS:The number of evidence-based treatment processes per patient was 14 (IQR 6 to 22) in Practice 1 and 6 (IQR 5 to 8) in Practice 2. Adoption: The utilization profiles of the eCDA differed greatly between practices. Implementation and Maintenance: After the long-term test, respondents were more critical of the quality of the CDM for patients with COPD, and attitudes consistent with interprofessional care were more prevalent compared to baseline. Respondents were optimistic regarding both the potential of the eCDA to improve the quality of CDM and their motivation to continue using the eCDA after long-term testing. CONCLUSION:This pilot study is a roadmap for future projects aiming to develop and implement eCDAs for the CDM of COPD in primary care. Future larger implementation studies in this domain should place greater emphasis on the measurement of structural practice characteristics as potential determinants of patient-relevant outcomes. The modifiable determinants should then be tested for their effects on patient-relevant outcomes in a randomized controlled design.