Japanese high bleeding risk criteria status predicts low thrombogenicity and bleeding events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Although the Japanese high bleeding risk criteria (J-HBR) were established to predict bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the thrombogenicity in the J-HBR status remains unknown. Here, we examined the relationships among J-HBR status, thrombogenicity and bleeding events. This study was a retrospective analysis of 300 consecutive patients who underwent PCI. Blood samples obtained on the day of PCI were used in the total thrombus-formation analysis system (T-TAS) to investigate the thrombus-formation area under the curve (AUC; PL 18 -AUC 10 for platelet chip; AR 10 -AUC 30 for atheroma chip). The J-HBR score was calculated by adding 1 point for any major criterion and 0.5 point for any minor criterion. We assigned patients to three groups based on J-HBR status: a J-HBR-negative group ( n = 80), a low score J-HBR-positive group (positive/low, n = 109), and a high score J-HBR-positive group (positive/high, n = 111). The primary end point was the 1-year incidence of bleeding events defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 2, 3, or 5. Both PL 18 -AUC 10 and AR 10 -AUC 30 levels were lower in the J-HBR-positive/high group than the negative group. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed worse 1-year bleeding event-free survival in the J-HBR-positive/high group compared with the negative group. In addition, both T-TAS levels in J-HBR positivity were lower in those with bleeding events than in those without bleeding events. In multivariate Cox regression analyses, the J-HBR-positive/high status was significantly associated with 1-year bleeding events. In conclusion, the J-HBR-positive/high status could reflect low thrombogenicity as measured by T-TAS and high bleeding risk in patients undergoing PCI.