Feasibility of soil and sludge standards for freshwater sediment pollutant determination and quality judgment

The environmental standards of soil and sludge have been typically referenced for freshwater sediment determination and quality assessment, especially in some areas without sediment standards. The feasibility of determination method and quality standard of soils and sludge for freshwater sediment was investigated in this study. Fractions of heavy metals, nitrogen, phosphorus, and reduced inorganic sulfur (RIS) in different type of samples were determined, including freshwater sediments, dryland and paddy soils, and sludge with air-drying (AD) and freeze-drying (FD) treatment, respectively. Results showed fraction distributions of heavy metals, nitrogen, phosphorus, and RIS in sediments markedly differed from those of soils and sludge. Fraction redistributions of heavy metals, nitrogen, phosphorus, and RIS in sediments were observed with AD compared to those treated by FD. The proportions of heavy metals, nitrogen, and phosphorus associated with organic matter (or sulfide) in FD sediments decreased by 4.8–74.2%, 9.5–37.5%, and 16.1–76.3%, respectively, compared to those in AD sediments, while those associated with Fe/Mn oxides increased by 6.3–39.1%, 50.9–226.9%, and 6.1–31.0%, respectively. The fraction proportions of RIS in sediments with AD also sharply decreased. Determination of standard methods for sludge and soil caused the distortion of pollutant fraction analysis in sediment. Similarly, the quality standard of sludge and soil was inappropriate for sediment quality assessment due to the differences in pollutant fraction pattern between sediment and soils/sludge. Totally, soil and sludge standards are inapplicable for freshwater sediment pollutant determination and quality judgment. This study would greatly advance the establishment of freshwater sediment determination methods and quality standards. Graphical Abstract