Correction: Follow-Up, Safety, and Satisfaction with Tele-bariatric Follow-Up Implemented During the COVID-19 French Lockdown: a 2-Year Follow-Up Study

Background The COVID-19 pandemic was initially responsible for a global restricted access to healthcare resources including the follow-up of at-risk populations such as bariatric patients. We substituted face-to-face bariatric follow-up outpatient clinics (FTFC) with teleclinics (TC) during the lockdown. Material and Methods We retrospectively reviewed data collected on all patients scheduled for TC during the French lockdown period (March 15 to May 15, 2020) ( N = 87). Our aims were to present the patients’ outcomes at one and 2 years post-TC implementation and describe patient/practitioner satisfaction. Results Seven (8%) patients required FTFC, and 80 (92%) underwent TC (study population) for preoperative bariatric assessment ( N = 3) and postoperative follow-up ( N = 77) after 23.6 ± 29 months following surgery. TC was performed with video and audio ( N = 46; 57.5%) or audio alone when video was impossible ( N = 34; 42.5%). Sixteen (20%) patients presented at least one complication identified at the first TC and were managed accordingly. There were no readmissions at 30/90 days post-TC. At 1-year after the first TC, overall follow-up rate was 94.9% (TC: 73% vs FTFC: 27%). Patients surveyed on the main advantages of TC over FTFC ( N = 46) cited: saving time (97.8%) at a mean 3.9 ± 6.4 h saved per TC, work-advantages (94.3%), and comparable relevance of TC (84.8%). At 2 years post-TC implementation, follow-up rate was 93.5% and satisfaction rate was 80%, with 33% of patients preferring to return to FTFC. Conclusions TC is a satisfactory substitute for FTFC, enabling continued bariatric follow-up during and beyond the pandemic setting without compromising patient safety. However, the modest satisfaction outcomes at 2 years highlight a need to discuss follow-up preferences in order to achieve optimal outcomes. Graphical Abstract