Proximal peroneal perforator flap, cadaveric study, and clinical applications for shallow defect reconstructions

PurposePeroneal artery perforator offers a versatile range of microvascular tissue transfer methods from local flaps to vascularized osteocutaneous fibula flaps. It is one of the few flaps that can cover shallow defects that require thin and pliable skin paddles, such as in hands and feet (Han et al., 2018). The proximal region of the lower leg offers such flexible and thin flap compared to the middle and distal lower leg (Winters & de Jongh, 1999). However, the anatomy of the proximal peroneal artery perforator is relatively unknown in literature and its proximity to the common peroneal nerve (CPN) has not yet been studied. This study conducted a cadaveric study and put it in application into clinical settings. MethodsTwenty lower leg specimens were dissected according to the methods of clinical proximal peroneal artery perforator flap harvest. Perforators arising in the proximal lower leg area of between 20 and 40 percentile of fibular length were inspected. Perforator length, location from fibular head, course, and location of CPN were recorded. Clinical reconstruction cases using the proximal lateral lower leg were analyzed. Six patients between the ages of thirty and seventy were included. Five cases were due to trauma, and one from mass excision, but all required thin and pliable flaps for reconstructions in hands or feet. Flaps were designed concentrical oval shapes, and harvest was done similarly to cadaveric perforator dissection, but perforator dissection was done only up to the required pedicle length. Perforator length, flap size, thickness, and long-term complications were recorded. ResultsAmong 20 specimens, a total of 20 perforators were found in 18 cadavers (90%). Two specimens showed no perforators while two specimens showed multiple perforators. The perforators were located at an average of 101 mm from fibular head, with an average length of 55 mm ranging from 20 to 153 mm. The average size of perforator at origin was 2.0 mm, ranging from 1.0 to 3.6 mm. 45% showed septocutaneous course and 55% intramuscular course. Two out of 20 perforators were shown to arise from source vessels other than the peroneal artery. All clinical cases were successful without complications or debulking for contour shaping. Flap sizes ranged from 15 to 40 cm(2). Largest flap width was 5 cm, and all donor sites were primarily closed without complications. One year of follow-up showed no complications. ConclusionProximal peroneal artery perforator flap provides a reliable pedicle for a versatile tissue transfer. This study shows that the perforators of the proximal lateral lower leg often arise from vessels other than the peroneal artery, such as the anterior tibial artery or popliteal artery, as had been previously reported (Winters & de Jongh, 1999). Although the source vessel varies, perforator anatomy is at a safe distance from CPN. This variation of source vessels suggests a change in nomenclature to "proximal peroneal perforator flap." The clinical applications of this flap showed that it can be effectively used for reconstructions of shallow defects, such as in the hands and feet without secondary procedures for debulking.