Assessing pregnancy outcomes in cow-calf operations after administration of modified-live or killed virus vaccinations at the initiation of synchronization for fixed-time AI
Theriogenology(2023)
Abstract
The objective of this study was to compare the reproductive outcomes (artificial insemination [AI] pregnancy rates, season pregnancy rates, AI pregnancy losses) and calf traits (birth and weaning weights) after vaccination of suckled beef cows against bovine herpesvirus 1 and bovine viral diarrhea virus using commercially-available modified-live virus (MLV) or killed virus (KV) vaccine at the initiation of a fixedtime AI program. Previously-vaccinated cows (n = 2138) on 14 farms throughout Virginia were enrolled in the study during the Fall 2017 and Spring 2018 breeding seasons. Animals received a single vaccination injection at 10 d pre-breeding, corresponding with time of CIDR insertion at initiation of the 7-d COSynch + CIDR synchronization protocol. Cows were inseminated at a fixed time (60-66 h after removal of the CIDR insert) and subsequently turned out with bulls approximately 1 wk after insemination for a natural service. Cows treated with the MLV vaccine had greater AI pregnancy rates than cows treated with the KV vaccine during the fall (P = 0.008; 54% vs. 46%, respectively), but not during the spring breeding season (P = 0.62; 48 vs. 49%). Season pregnancy rates were greater (P = 0.01) in the fall (95 -96%) than in the spring breeding season (89-90%), but were not affected by vaccine treatment (P = 0.49) or treatment by season (P = 0.30) interactions. Percentage of AI pregnancy losses was not affected by season (P = 0.85), vaccine treatment (P = 0.83), or treatment by season interactions (P = 0.68). The number of cycles it took for cows to become pregnant by natural service differed by season (P = 0.006) but not treatment (P = 0.87) or treatment by season interaction (P = 0.997). Cows treated with the MLV vaccine gave birth earlier in the calving season (8.36 +/- 0.6 d) than those treated with the KV vaccine (10.31 +/- 0.6 d; P = 0.02). There was a main effect of season on birth weights (P = 0.008), weaning weights (P < 0.001), and ADG at weaning (P < 0.001), but no effects of treatment (P >= 0.26) or treatment by season interaction (P >= 0.10) on any of these parameters. Overall, this study demonstrated that the administration of an MLV vaccine at 10 d before fixed-time AI did not have any adverse effects on pregnancy or calf outcomes compared with KV vaccine administration. (c) 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc.
MoreTranslated text
Key words
AI,Bovine,Breeding,Modified -live virus,Synchronization,Vaccination
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
![](https://originalfileserver.aminer.cn/sys/aminer/pubs/mrt_preview.jpeg)
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined