Critical geoeconomics: A genealogy of writing politics, economy and space

Towards the end of the Cold War, the vocabulary of global power, space and economy received a qualitative update. Amongst the terms rapidly gaining prominence since the early 1990s has been the notion of geoeconomics, the coining of which has frequently been attributed to the strategist Edward N. Luttwak. In his interpretation, it signified a transition away from Cold War ideological and military geopolitical competition towards commerce and market-based geo-power. Over the past three decades, a 'geoeconomics boom' set in, characterised by think tanks and a varied body of politico-economic literature making extensive use of the term. Conventionally treated as a neologism, the provenance and earlier iterations of geoeconomics, some dating back more than a century, have been largely ignored by both celebratory and critical accounts. In this paper, we trace and contextualise these earlier instances, leading us to the Geopolitik era in Germany and references to geoeconomics in the United States in the decades after WWII. We thereby offer a critical genealogy of geoeconomics, conceptualised as an object of definitional struggle. Proponents of the term sought to position it variously as a tool of national economic cohesion and competition or as a way of understanding and harnessing shifting global power relations, whilst others sought to subsume geoeconomics to geopolitics. These past struggles track forward into ongoing dialectical tensions between geoeconomics and geopolitics as competing but related geostrategic visions. The notion of geoeconomics became increasingly popular since the 1990s. Conventionally treated as a neologism, attributed to the strategist Edward N. Luttwak, earlier iterations of geoeconomics, some dating back more than a century, have been ignored by both celebratory and critical accounts. We develop a critical genealogy of geoeconomics, arguing that past debates track forward into ongoing dialectical tensions between geoeconomics and geopolitics as competing but related geostrategic visions.image