Assessment of the Status of Supervision and Social Criticism of the Majority of People in the Fields of Land at Quy Nhon City, Binh Dinh Province

The result shows that in practice, social supervision and criticism have not mobilized public opinions contributions from the people, mainly through the representative mechanism (invitation to meetings, inviting criticism, inviting comments) because the people are still unaware of their right to supervise the land. At the same time, people do not grasp all information related to land use planning, information on compensation, or information on land prices. The current law does not have specific guidelines on how and the process to carry out the counter-arrival and supervision. Notably, only 5% of the survey respondents said that they had contributed ideas about the projects implemented in land use planning. 70.5% of surveyed households suppose dialogue the meeting is only held for small citizens.