Prognostic Factors and Outcome of Surgically Treated Supratentorial Versus Infratentorial Epidural Hematoma in Pediatrics: A Comparative Study of 350 Patients at a Tertiary Center of a Developing Country

PURPOSE:In children, epidural hematomas (EDHs) constitute around 2% to 3% of all head traumas. The aim of this study is to compare the manifestation, prognostic factors, and outcome of surgically treated supratentorial with infratentorial EDHs in pediatric patients. METHODS:This is a hospital-based single-center, retrospective study of 350 pediatric patients admitted between January 2016 and December 2021. All pediatric patients to 18 years of age with posttraumatic EDHs with or without other intracranial/extracranial injuries who underwent surgical evacuation were included in the study. Posttraumatic EDHs treated conservatively during the hospital stay and any EDH unrelated to head trauma were excluded. Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score was used to assess functional outcomes at discharge. The status of the patients at 3-month follow-up was assessed by using the pediatric version of the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E Peds) Score. RESULTS:Out of 350 patients, 310 had supratentorial EDH and 40 had infratentorial EDH. In supratentorial EDH, the volume of hematoma, mass effect, and the time interval between trauma and surgery correlated with functional outcome (GOS) at discharge. Anisocoria, hypotension, and intradural injury were associated with functional as well as behavioral outcomes (GOS-E Peds) in the supratentorial EDH group. The severity of the injury was correlated with the functional and behavioral outcomes in both groups. CONCLUSIONS:Infratentorial EDH has better clinical outcomes than supratentorial EDH in surgically treated pediatric patients. The most significant and consistent factor influencing the outcome in both groups was the Glasgow Coma Score on admission.