Evaluation of AlphaFold-Multimer prediction on multi-chain protein complexes

Motivation Despite near-experimental accuracy on single-chain predictions, there is still scope for improvement among multimeric predictions. Methods like AlphaFold-Multimer and FoldDock can accurately model dimers. However, how well these methods fare on larger complexes is still unclear. Further, evaluation methods of the quality of multimeric complexes are not well established. Results We analysed the performance of AlphaFold-Multimer on a homology-reduced dataset of homo- and heteromeric protein complexes. We highlight the differences between the pairwise and multi-interface evaluation of chains within a multimer. We describe why certain complexes perform well on one metric (e.g., TM-score) but poorly on another (e.g., DockQ). We propose a new score, Predicted DockQ version 2 (pDockQ2), to estimate the quality of each interface in a multimer. Finally, we modelled protein complexes (from CORUM) and identified two highly confident structures that do not have sequence homology to any existing structures. Availability All scripts, models, and data used to perform the analysis in this study are freely available at . Contact arne{at}bioinfo.se Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.