Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

Detection of Post-COVID-19 Lung Abnormalities: Photon-counting CT versus Same-Day Energy-integrating Detector CT

Florian Prayer,Patric Kienast, Andreas Strassl,Philipp T. Moser, Dominik Bernitzky,Christopher Milacek, Mariann Gyoengyoesi, Daria Kifjak, Sebastian Roehrich,Lucian Beer,Martin L. Watzenboeck,Ruxandra I. Milos, Christian Wassipaul, Daniela Gompelmann,Christian J. Herold,Helmut Prosch,Benedikt H. Heidinger

Radiology(2023)

Cited 11|Views21
No score
Abstract
Background: Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT enables ultra-high-resolution lung imaging and may shed light on morphologic correlates of persistent symptoms after COVID-19.Purpose: To compare PCD CT with energy-integrating detector (EID) CT for noninvasive assessment of post-COVID-19 lung abnormalities. Materials and Methods: For this prospective study, adult participants with one or more COVID-19-related persisting symptoms (resting or exertional dyspnea, cough, fatigue) underwent same-day EID and PCD CT between April 2022 and June 2022. The 1.0-mm EID CT images and, subsequently, 1.0-, 0.4-, and 0.2-mm PCD CT images were reviewed for the presence of lung abnormalities. Subjective and objective EID and PCD CT image quality were evaluated using a five-point Likert scale (-2 to 2) and lung signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs).Results: Twenty participants (mean age, 54 years +/- 16 [SD]; 10 men) were included. EID CT showed post-COVID-19 lung abnormalities in 15 of 20 (75%) participants, with a median involvement of 10% of lung volume [IQR, 0%-45%] and 3.5 lobes [IQR, 0-5]. Ground-glass opacities and linear bands (10 of 20 participants [50%] for both) were the most frequent findings at EID CT. PCD CT revealed additional lung abnormalities in 10 of 20 (50%) participants, with the most common being bronchiectasis (10 of 20 [50%]). Subjective image quality was improved for 1.0-mm PCD versus 1.0-mm EID CT images (median, 1; IQR, 1-2; P < .001) and 0.4-mm versus 1.0-mm PCD CT images (median, 1; IQR, 1-1; P < .001) but not for 0.4-mm versus 0.2-mm PCD CT images (median, 0; IQR, 0-0.5; P = .26). PCD CT delivered higher lung SNR versus EID CT for 1.0-mm images (mean difference, 0.53 +/- 0.96; P = .03) but lower SNR for 0.4-mm versus 1.0-mm images and 0.2-mm vs 0.4-mm images (-1.52 +/- 0.68 [P < .001] and -1.15 +/- 0.43 [P < .001], respectively).Conclusan: Photon-counting detector CT outperformed energy-integrating detector CT in the visualization of subtle post-COVID-19 lung abnormalities and image quality.
More
Translated text
Key words
lung,detection,post-covid,photon-counting,same-day,energy-integrating
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined