Infertility and treatments used have minimal effects on first-trimester placental DNA methylation and gene expression.

Fertility and sterility(2022)

引用 3|浏览29
暂无评分
摘要
OBJECTIVE:To determine whether deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) methylation alterations exist in the first-trimester human placenta between conceptions using fertility treatments and those that do not and, if so, whether they are the result of underlying infertility or fertility treatments. We also assessed whether significant alterations led to changes in gene expression. DESIGN:We compared DNA methylation of the first-trimester placenta from singleton pregnancies that resulted in live births from unassisted, in vitro fertilization (IVF), and non-IVF fertility treatment (NIFT) conceptions using the Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip array. Significant CpG sites were compared with corresponding ribonucleic acid sequencing analysis in similar cohorts to determine whether methylation alterations lead to differences in gene expression. SETTING:Academic medical center. PATIENT(S):A total of 138 singleton pregnancies undergoing chorionic villus sampling resulting in a live birth were recruited for methylation analysis (56 unassisted, 38 NIFT, and 44 IVF conceptions). Ribonucleic acid-sequencing data consisted of 141 subjects (74 unassisted, 33 NIFT, and 34 IVF conceptions) of which 116 overlapped with the methylation cohort. INTERVENTION(S):In vitro fertilization-conceived pregnancy or pregnancy conceived via NIFT, such as ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S):Significant methylation changes at CpG sites after adjustment for multiple comparisons. The secondary outcome was gene expression changes of significant CpG sites. RESULT(S):Of the 741,145 probes analyzed in the placenta, few were significant at Bonferroni <0.05: 185 CpG sites (0.025%) significant in pregnancies conceived with the fertility treatments (NIFT + IVF) vs. unassisted conceptions; 28 in NIFT vs. unassisted; 195 in IVF vs. unassisted; and only 13 (0.0018%) in IVF vs. NIFT conceptions. Of all significant CpG sites combined, 10% (35) were located in genes with suggestive gene expression changes, but none were significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons (ribonucleic acid sequencing false discovery rate <0.05). None of the 13 differentially methylated probes in the IVF vs. NIFT placenta were located in genes with suggestive IVF vs. NIFT gene expression differences. CONCLUSION(S):Underlying infertility is the most significant contributor to the minimal differences in first-trimester placental methylation, and not the specific fertility treatment used, such as IVF.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要