DL-EPR vs. LSV-KOH: from simple detection of deleterious phases to analysis of morphology and high accuracy on determination of sigma phase in UNS S32750 stainless steel

CORROSION ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY(2023)

Cited 1|Views10
No score
Abstract
An optimised electrochemical technique, linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) in KOH solution (LSV-KOH) was confronted with the double loop electrochemical Potentiokinetic reactivation (DL-EPR) to verify which is the best technique to quantify deleterious phases (DP) in a UNS S32750 super duplex stainless steel. DL-EPR presented an error in determination of deleterious phases in the range of 6.9-100%. LSV-KOH show a better accuracy in quantification of deleterious phases volume fractions, the error range for LSV-KOH was 2.4-26.2%. When the morphology of sigma changes from lamellar to divorced, was observed modifications on LSV-KOH voltammograms. In specimens where lamellar morphology is present, the voltammograms show two peaks curve. Meanwhile, in specimens where occurred also divorced precipitation of sigma the voltammograms changes to a 3 peaks curve. This feature is due to the dissolution of sigma phase boundaries which has different compositions according to the form of sigma precipitation.
More
Translated text
Key words
Stainless steel,deleterious phases,sigma phase morphology,linear sweep voltammetry
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined