Comparison of guidelines for biological ancillary materials used for the manufacture of gene and cellular therapy products in Asia.

Cytotherapy(2023)

Cited 3|Views5
No score
Abstract
The guidelines could be classified into two types based on whether specific AMs are scoped: (i) general guidelines for risk assessment of AMs and (ii) guidelines for specific AMs. The authors compared the risk categories for each type of AM provided in the general guidelines between the US and China and the specific requirements for bovine serum and trypsin in the guidelines of China, Japan, Taiwan, US and EU. The authors further compiled in-depth descriptions of the respective regulations in China, India, Japan, Korea and Taiwan. There is limited availability of some guidelines for specific AMs. Moreover, there are no common requirements established across the surveyed countries and regions. Therefore, the authors suggest a risk assessment approach for AMs with consideration of their biological origin and traceability, production steps applied and ability to control or remove AMs from the final medicinal product over the CGT manufacturing process.
More
Translated text
Key words
APACRM,Asia,ancillary materials,cell and gene therapy products,regulatory guidelines
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined