Scoping the Line Up: A Comparison of Biomonitoring Methodologies for Surf Zone Fish Communities

Surf zones are highly dynamic marine ecosystems that are subject to increasing anthropogenic and climatic pressures, posing multiple challenges for biomonitoring. Traditional methods such as seines and hook and line surveys are often labor intensive, taxonomically biased, and can be physically hazardous. Emerging techniques, such as baited remote underwater video (BRUV) and environmental DNA (eDNA) are promising nondestructive tools for assessing marine biodiversity in surf zones of sandy beaches. Here we compare the relative performance of beach seines, BRUV, and eDNA in characterizing community composition of bony (teleost) and cartilaginous (elasmobranch) fishes of surf zones at 18 open coast sandy beaches in southern California. Seine and BRUV surveys captured overlapping, but distinct fish communities with 50% (18/36) of detected species shared. BRUV surveys more frequently detected larger species (e.g. sharks and rays) while seines more frequently detected one of the most abundant species, barred surfperch ( Amphistichus argenteus ). In contrast, eDNA metabarcoding captured 83.3% (30/36) of all fishes observed in seine and BRUV surveys plus 59 additional species, including 13 that frequent surf zone habitats. eDNA approaches showed significantly higher sensitivity than seine and BRUV methods and more consistently detected 29 of the 30 (96.7%) jointly observed species across beaches. The six species detected by BRUV/seines, but not eDNA either lacked reference sequences, were only resolved at higher taxonomic ranks (e.g. Embiotocidae surfperches), or were detected below occupancy thresholds. Low site-species overlap between methods limited comparisons of richness and abundance estimates, highlighting the challenge of comparing biomonitoring approaches. Despite potential for improvement, results overall demonstrate that eDNA can provide a cost-effective tool for long-term surf zone monitoring that complements data from seine and BRUV surveys, allowing more comprehensive surveys of vertebrate diversity in surf zone habitats. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.