Temporal and spatial goal-directed reaching in upper limb prosthesis users

Understanding the fundamental characteristics of prosthetic movement control is imperative in improving prosthesis design and training. This study quantified how using an upper limb prosthesis affected performance during goal-directed reaching tasks. Nine prosthesis users with unilateral transradial limb absence and nine healthy controls completed a series of goal-directed reaching movements with different goals: one spatial and three temporal with different goal frequencies. We quantified end-point accuracy, smoothness, and peak speed for the spatial task and temporal accuracy, horizontal distance, and speed for the temporal task. For the temporal task, we also used a goal-equivalent manifold (GEM) approach to decompose variability in movement distance and speed into those perpendicular and tangential to the GEM. Detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) quantified the temporal persistence of each time series. For the spatial task, movements made with prostheses were less smooth, had larger end-point errors, and had slower peak speed compared to those with control limbs ( p < 0.041). For the temporal task, movements made with prostheses and intact limbs of prosthesis users and control limbs were similar in distance and speed and had similar timing errors ( p > 0.138). Timing errors, distance, speed, and GEM deviations were corrected similarly between prosthetic limbs and control limbs ( p > 0.091). The mean and variability of distance, speed, and perpendicular deviations decreased with increased goal frequency ( p < 0.001). Our results suggest that prosthesis users have a sufficient internal model to successfully complete ballistic movements but are unable to accurately complete movements requiring substantial feedback.