One does not fit all! On the Complementarity of Vision Encoders for Vision and Language Tasks

Current multimodal models, aimed at solving Vision and Language (V+L) tasks, predominantly repurpose Vision Encoders (VE) as feature extractors. While many VEs -- of different architectures, trained on different data and objectives -- are publicly available, they are not designed for the downstream V+L tasks. Nonetheless, most current work assumes that a \textit{single} pre-trained VE can serve as a general-purpose encoder. In this work, we evaluate whether the information stored within different VEs is complementary, i.e. if providing the model with features from multiple VEs can improve the performance on a target task. We exhaustively experiment with three popular VEs on six downstream V+L tasks and analyze the attention and VE-dropout patterns. Our results and analyses suggest that diverse VEs complement each other, resulting in improved downstream V+L task performance, where the improvements are not due to simple ensemble effects (i.e. the performance does not always improve when increasing the number of encoders). We demonstrate that future VEs, which are not \textit{repurposed}, but explicitly \textit{designed} for V+L tasks, have the potential of improving performance on the target V+L tasks.