Comparison of intrarenal pressure between convention and vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath using an ex vivo porcine kidney model

Objective This study aimed to prove the vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath (vaUAS) is more effective in maintaining a lower IRP than conventional ureteral access sheath (cUAS). Materials The model consisted of 12 freshly harvested adult porcine kidneys. Methods Either a 12/14F cUAS or vaUAS was alternately inserted into the ureter to one cm below the renal pelvis. Upper, middle, and lower calyces were punctured, and 6F pressure monitor catheters were introduced. IRP with cUAS was monitored using various irrigation rates. IRP with vaUAS was monitored with the same irrigation rates; various aspiration pressures; and vent fully closed, 50% closed, and fully open. Results cUAS with irrigation rate of 50 cc/min resulted in IRP < 30 mmHg. 50 to 100 cc/min should be used with caution. When irrigation rate exceeded 100 cc/min, IRP rose to ≥ 30 mmHg in most instances. With vent closed, vaUAS with vacuum pressure ≥ 150 mmHg and irrigation rate of 50 cc, 100 cc, and 150 cc/min generally resulted in IRPs < 5 mmHg. With vent half closed, vaUAS with vacuum pressure ≥ 300 mmHg and irrigation rate of ≤ 100 cc/min avoided IRP > 30 mmHg. vaUAS with vent open showed limited advantages over cUAS. Conclusion vaUAS maintains lower IRP than cUAS under same parameters. Both vaUAS and cUAS can be used when irrigation is ≤ 50 cc/min vaUAS showed clear advantages over cUAS in maintaining lower pressure when irrigation rate is ≥ 100 cc/min.