Phylogenetic distance affects the artificial microbial consortia’s effectiveness and colonization during the bioremediation of polluted soil with Cr(VI) and atrazine

Soils co-contaminated with heavy metals and organic pollutants are common and threaten the natural environment and human health. Although artificial microbial consortia have advantages over single strains, the mechanism affecting their effectiveness and colonization in polluted soils still requires determination. Here, we constructed two kinds of artificial microbial consortia from the same or different phylogenetic groups and inoculated them into soil co-contaminated with Cr(VI) and atrazine to study the effects of phylogenetic distance on consortia effectiveness and colonization. The residual concentrations of pollutants demonstrated that the artificial microbial consortium from different phylogenetic groups achieved the highest removal rates of Cr(VI) and atrazine. The removal rate of 400 mg/kg atrazine was 100%, while that of 40 mg/kg Cr(VI) was 57.7%. High-throughput sequence analysis showed that the soil bacterial negative correlations, core genera, and potential metabolic interactions differed among treatments. Furthermore, artificial microbial consortia from different phylogenetic groups had better colonization and a more significant effect on the abundance of native core bacteria than consortia from the same phylogenetic group. Our study highlights the importance of phylogenetic distance on consortium effectiveness and colonization and offers insight into the bioremediation of combined pollutants.