Regional implementation of atrial fibrillation screening: benefits and pitfalls

AimsDespite general awareness that screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) could reduce health hazards, large-scale implementation is lagging behind technological developments. As the successful implementation of a screening programme remains challenging, this study aims to identify facilitating and inhibiting factors from healthcare providers' perspectives.Methods and resultsA mixed-methods approach was used to gather data among practice nurses in primary care in the southern region of the Netherlands to evaluate the implementation of an ongoing single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG)-based AF screening programme. Potential facilitating and inhibiting factors were evaluated using online questionnaires (N = 74/75%) and 14 (of 24) semi-structured in-depth interviews (58.3%). All analyses were performed using SPSS 26.0. In total, 16 682 screenings were performed on an eligible population of 64 000, and 100 new AF cases were detected. Facilitating factors included 'receiving clear instructions' (mean +/- SD; 4.12 +/- 1.05), 'easy use of the ECG-based device' (4.58 +/- 0.68), and 'patient satisfaction' (4.22 +/- 0.65). Inhibiting factors were 'time availability' (3.20 +/- 1.10), 'insufficient feedback to the practice nurse' (2.15 +/- 0.89), 'absence of coordination' (54%), and the 'lack of fitting policy' (32%).ConclusionLarge-scale regional implementation of an AF screening programme in primary care resulted in a low participation of all eligible patients. Based on the perceived barriers by healthcare providers, future AF screening programmes should create preconditions to fit the intervention into daily routines, appointing an overall project lead and a General Practitioner (GP) as a coordinator within every GP practice. Graphical Abstract