A comparative study of two grasswren species reveals strong genetic divergence between a peninsula and mainland population

Dispersal patterns dictate genetic population structure, and ultimately population resilience, through maintaining critical ecological processes and genetic diversity. Direct observation of dispersal events is not often possible, but genetic methods offer an alternative method of indirectly measuring dispersal. Here, we use 7 652 genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to evaluate genetic population structure and infer dispersal capabilities of the Western Grasswren (Amytornis textilis textilis; WGW) in Western Australia ( n = 118), utilising a sister species, the Thick-billed Grasswren (Amytornis modestus; TBGW) as a comparison dataset ( n = 80). We found genetic divergence and low genetic diversity between two populations (Hamelin and Peron) in the WGW, despite evidence of long dispersal distances within populations by females. In addition, the two WGW populations were found to be more genetically divergent than two described subspecies of TBGW, despite the WGW occurring over a smaller spatial scale. By comparing these two grasswren species, our data suggest a narrow strip of land may be acting as a geographic barrier in the WGW, limiting dispersal between a peninsula population to the mainland. We investigate if morphology aligns with genetic divergence, with some estimates of divergence between WGW populations greater than those between subspecies of TBGW. However, confidence intervals were large, preventing definitive conclusions. Our results support the hypothesis that peninsula populations of small, ground-dwelling birds are genetically isolated from adjacent mainland populations. Furthermore, there is evidence to suggest that the limited gene flow is asymmetrical, with directional dispersal occurring from the bounded peninsula population to the mainland. Our study also highlights how substantial genetic divergence does not necessarily coincide with phenotypic differences. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.