A Tale of Two Trees: Modeling Apical and Basal Tree Contribution to L2/3 V1 Pyramidal Cell Orientation Selectivity

Pyramidal neurons, a mainstay of cortical regions, receive a plethora of inputs from various areas onto their morphologically distinct apical and basal trees. Both trees differentially contribute to the somatic response, defining distinct anatomical and possibly functional sub-units. To elucidate the contribution of each tree to the encoding of visual stimuli at the somatic level, we modeled the response pattern of a L2/3 V1 pyramidal neuron to orientation tuned synaptic input. Towards this goal, we used a morphologically detailed computational model of a single cell that replicates electrophysiological and two-photon imaging data. Our simulations predict a synergistic effect of apical and basal trees on somatic action potential generation: basal tree activity, in the form of either depolarization or dendritic spiking, is necessary for producing somatic activity, despite the fact that most somatic spikes are heavily driven by apical dendritic spikes. This model provides evidence for synergistic computations taking place in the basal and apical trees of the L2/3 V1 neuron along with mechanistic explanations for tree-specific contributions and emphasizes the potential role of predictive and attentional feedback input in these cells. ![Abstract Figure][1] Abstract Figure Graphical Representation of AP Generation in a L2/3 V1 Pyramidal Neuron Model Action potential generation requires the spatiotemporal coincidence of apical sodium spikes with either basal sodium spikes or significant basal depolarizations, allowing the neuron to respond to salient stimuli that may or may not be affected by attentional and/or predictive signals from higher-order areas. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. [1]: pending:yes