Effect of three-dimensional deformation at different temperatures on microstructure, strength, fracture toughness and corrosion resistance of 7A85 aluminum alloy

In this study, 7A85 aluminum alloy was subjected to 20% three-dimensional (3D) deformation at different temperatures (-196, 25, 250, and 480 degrees C), followed by solid solution, water quenching, 3% cold deformation, and retrogression and re-aging (RRA) treatment. The microstructural evolution and 3D mechanical prop-erties, fracture toughness, electrical conductivity, and corrosion resistance of the alloy under different deformation processes were analyzed for comparison. The results indicated that conducting the 3D de -formation process prior to solution treatment significantly improved the strength and fracture toughness of the alloy as compared to the undeformed (UD) specimen, and maintained its good corrosion resistance under the RRA treatment. In addition, with the decrease of the deformation temperature, the greater flow stress strongly sheared and crushed the coarse second-phase particles into fine particles, thus facilitating their full dissolution in the aluminum matrix during subsequent solution treatment and increasing the driving force for aging precipitation. Furthermore, more dislocations were introduced at low-temperature deformation, thus providing more nucleation sites for static recrystallization during solution treatment and refining grains. Ultimately, the densest precipitates and the finest equiaxed grains with the narrowest grain boundary precipitate-free zones (PFZs) were acquired for the cryogenic deformation (CD) sample, resulting in the highest ultimate tensile strength (UTS), elongation (EL) with the least anisotropy, and fracture toughness of the CD specimen. The optimal comprehensive performance was obtained for the CD specimen with the average 3D UTS, average 3D yield strength (YS), average 3D EL, and fracture toughness of 545 MPa, 476 MPa, 16%, and 42.49 MPamiddotm1/2, respectively, which were respectively 2.3%, 0.2%, 18.5%, and 21.4% higher than those of the UD specimen.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.