Invited Perspective: Forward Progress in Characterizing the Mortality Burden of PM2.5 for India

Vol. 130, No. 9 Invited PerspectiveOpen AccessInvited Perspective: Forward Progress in Characterizing the Mortality Burden of PM2.5 for Indiais accompanied byMortality Associated with Ambient PM2.5 Exposure in India: Results from the Million Death Study Sara D. Adar and Pallavi Pant Sara D. Adar Address correspondence to Sara D. Adar, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1420 Washington Heights, SPHII-5539, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA. Email: E-mail Address: [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8383-485X Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA Search for more papers by this author and Pallavi Pant Health Effects Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Search for more papers by this author Published:14 September 2022CID: 091303https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP10979AboutSectionsPDF ToolsDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InReddit Home to nearly 1.4 billion people (World Bank 2022), India is one of the most populated countries in the world. India also has some of the highest levels of air pollution, with an estimated population-weighted mean fine ambient particulate matter [PM ≤2.5μm in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5)] concentration of 91.7 μg/m3 in 2019 and virtually all people living at levels above the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Air Quality Guidelines (India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative Air Pollution Collaborators 2021). Given these high exposures, it has been estimated that nearly 1 million deaths and 31 million years of healthy life were lost in 2019 due to ambient PM2.5.These burden estimates clearly suggest a public health problem requiring intervention. However, these estimates (and other global and regional estimates) rely on evidence generated from elsewhere in the world—largely in North America and Europe, and only more recently from Asia and the Middle East. Although experts have argued that relying on estimates from other nations should produce reliable estimates for India in the absence of area-specific information (GBD MAPS Working Group 2018; Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India 2015), why has local evidence not been available? The answer lies with a historic lack of data in India. Reporting by the Civil Registration System Division in India indicates steady improvement in the capture of deaths by administrative records over time but the data completeness did not exceed 70% until after 2018 (ORGI 2020). For many states and region territories, the capture is closer to 50% and, nationally, <20% of deaths are medically certified with an underlying cause. In addition, local and national air pollution data and modeled estimates have only become widely available in the last 5–10 y.Brown et al. (2022) address this knowledge gap by leveraging data from the Million Death Study and satellite-derived estimates of ambient PM2.5 concentrations for India. Specifically, they linked ambient PM2.5 (0.1° resolution) to cause-specific mortality rates for nearly 7,500 urban postal codes and rural villages throughout India. In these communities, nearly 7 million individuals were actively surveilled for mortality using a validated instrument. For every 10-μg/m3 increase in estimated PM2.5, they documented a 9% higher rate for stroke mortality (95% confidence interval: 1.04, 1.14) after adjustments for age, sex, time, area-level urbanicity, area-level socioeconomic characteristics, and place. More modest associations were observed with nonaccidental and chronic respiratory disease mortality, and null associations were found with heart attack mortality. Notably, given the interquartile range in India (∼20 μg/m3), these associations appear even larger (up to 1.17) when expressed as contrasts between high- and low-exposed individuals.Overall, these findings confirm that air pollution likely results in premature mortality in India, mostly via stroke. Many of the associations, however, were weaker than what may have been expected given the current global evidence on the association between air pollution and respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. This may be important because burden estimates, including those by the Global Burden of Disease project and WHO assume that air pollution–mortality relationships are supralinear (India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative Air Pollution Collaborators 2021) even though relatively few studies have assessed the concentration–response function at high PM2.5 levels. In fact, the concentration–response function used before 2019 relied on extrapolations from tobacco smoking (Burnett et al. 2014), although newer estimates use data from five studies in China, Hong Kong, and 21 nations of the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology study (India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative Air Pollution Collaborators 2021; GBD 2019 Risk Factors Collaborators 2020).There are several possible explanations for the weaker associations observed in this study. One simple explanation is that any sample has normal variation and that the confidence intervals for this study include values consistent with previous estimates. Another possibility relates to differential toxicity of local sources. In India, PM2.5 has a larger fraction from biomass burning as compared with North America and Europe (McDuffie et al. 2021; GBD Maps Working Group 2018), which could be less toxic than other sources. Evidence supporting this hypothesis comes from China, where associations with daily mortality were weaker in rural areas (where more biomass burning occurs) than in urban areas (where fossil fuel combustion dominates) (Chen et al. 2017). Yet the same rural–urban trends did not seem to hold in India. A second causal hypothesis relates to India’s lower life expectancy than other nations (World Bank 2022) that inform the air-pollution mortality relationship. This could result in weaker associations if PM2.5 is less toxic at younger ages or in the context of more competing risks. However, Brown et al. (2022) did not observe consistent effect modification by age.It is also possible, as with all epidemiological studies, that residual bias influenced the results. Although deaths were recorded for individuals, the data were analyzed as rates per geographic area with age and sex as the only individual-level covariates. This could imply that residual confounding may remain. Although adjustment for place may capture some variation in individual and community risk factors that correlate with air pollution, knowing how granular of an adjustment to include can be quite challenging and the results of Brown et al. (2022) did show strong sensitivity to adjustment for place. It may also be that the definitions for cause-specific mortality, such as from heart attacks, differed from other studies and may have impacted the magnitude of their findings. Similarly, it is possible that the use of verbal autopsies may have introduced some differential error by place.Despite these potential issues, this study is important as the first to evaluate long-term PM2.5 exposure and mortality across all of India. Together with other recent studies (Hadley et al. 2022; Hystad et al. 2019, 2020), it begins to resolve a critical research gap on the adverse health effects of air pollution in low- and middle-income countries and regions with high levels of ambient air pollution. Somewhat curiously, results from this study differ significantly from the global body of evidence, especially on cardiovascular outcomes. This warrants attention and the work should be extended with confirmation of these findings in other data sets with individual-level data, evaluations of household air pollution–mortality relationships, and use of personal exposure estimates in future analyses. Fortunately, there is a rapid growth of research in India, including studies such as the Longitudinal Aging Study of India (Bloom et al. 2021), Tamil Nadu Air Pollution and Health Effects (Balakrishnan et al. 2015), Global Environmental and Occupational Health–India (Walia et al. 2020), and Cardiovascular Health Effects of Air Pollution in Andhra Pradesh, India (Tonne et al. 2017). There are also ongoing efforts to strengthen collaborations and technical expertise on air pollution epidemiology through the Collaborative for Air Pollution and Health Effects Research–India. Therefore, we expect to see a rapid expansion in the research building upon this work in the future. Better characterization of the health effects of PM2.5 in India will ultimately be useful in informing future strategies to improve public health in India as well as our understanding of health effects of air pollution globally.ReferencesBalakrishnan K, Sambandam S, Ramaswamy P, Ghosh S, Venkatesan V, Thangavel G, et al.2015. Establishing integrated rural–urban cohorts to assess air pollution-related health effects in pregnant women, children and adults in Southern India: an overview of objectives, design and methods in the Tamil Nadu Air Pollution and Health Effects (TAPHE) study. BMJ Open 5(6):e008090, PMID: 26063570, 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008090. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarBloom DE, Sekher TV, Lee J. 2021. Longitudinal Aging Study in India (LASI): new data resources for addressing aging in India. Nat Aging 1(Dec):1070–1072, 10.1038/s43587-021-00155-y. Crossref, Google ScholarBrown P, Izawa Y, Balakrishnan K, Fu SH, Chakma J, Menon G, et al.2022. Mortality from particulate matter 2.5 in India: national retrospective cohort study. Environ Health Perspect 130(9):097004, 10.1289/EHP9538. Link, Google ScholarBurnett RT, Pope CA, Ezzati M, Olives C, Lim SS, Mehta S, et al.2014. An integrated risk function for estimating the global burden of disease attributable to ambient fine particulate matter exposure. Environ Health Perspect 122(4):, 10.128/ehp.1307049. Crossref, Google ScholarChen R, Yin P, Meng X, Liu C, Wang L, Xu X, et al.2017. Fine particulate air pollution and daily mortality. A nationwide analysis in 272 Chinese cities. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 196(1):73–81, PMID: 28248546, 10.1164/rccm.201609-1862OC. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarGBD 2019 Risk Factors Collaborators.2020. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 396(10258):1223–1249, PMID: 33069327, 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30752-2. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarGBD MAPS Working Group.2018. Burden of Disease Attributable to Major Air Pollution Sources in India. Special Report 21. Boston, MA: Health Effects Institute. Google ScholarHadley MB, Nalini M, Adhikari S, Szymonifka J, Etemadi A, Kamangar F, et al.2022. Spatial environmental factors predict cardiovascular and all-cause mortality: results of the SPACE study. PLoS One 17(6):e0269650, PMID: 35749347, 10.1371/journal.pone.0269650. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarHystad P, Duong M, Brauer M, Larkin A, Arku R, Kurmi OP, et al.2019. Health effects of household solid fuel use: findings from 11 countries within the Prospective Urban and Rural Epidemiology study. Environ Health Perspect 127(5):57003, PMID: 31067132, 10.1289/EHP3915. Link, Google ScholarHystad P, Larkin A, Rangarajan S, AlHabib KF, Avezum Á, Calik KBT, et al.2020. Associations of outdoor fine particulate air pollution and cardiovascular disease in 157 436 individuals from 21 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries (PURE): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Planet Health 4(6):e235–e245, PMID: 32559440, 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30103-0. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarIndia State-Level Disease Burden Initiative Air Pollution Collaborators.2021. Health and economic impact of air pollution in the states of India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Planet Health 5(1):e25–e38, PMID: 33357500, 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30298-9. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarMcDuffie EE, Martin RV, Spadaro JV, Burnett R, Smith SJ, O’Rourke P, et al.2021. Source sector and fuel contributions to ambient PM2.5 and attributable mortality across multiple spatial scales. Nat Commun 12(1):3594, PMID: 34127654, 10.1038/s41467-021-23853-y. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarMinistry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.2015. Report of the Steering Committee on Air Pollution and Health-Related Issues. New Delhi, India: Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Google ScholarORGI (Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India).2020. Report on Vital Statistics of India based on the Civil Registration System-2020. CRS_Report_2020. May 5, 2022. Google ScholarTonne C, Salmon M, Sanchez M, Sreekanth V, Bhogadi S, Sambandam S, et al.2017. Integrated assessment of exposure to PM2.5 in South India and its relation with cardiovascular risk: design of the CHAI observational cohort study. Int J Hyg Environ Health 220(6):1081–1088, PMID: 28606699, 10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.05.005. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarWalia GK, Mandal S, Jaganathan S, Jaacks LM, Sieber NL, Dhillon PK, et al.2020. Leveraging existing cohorts to study health effects of air pollution on cardiometabolic disorders: India Global Environmental and Occupational Health Hub. Environ Health Insights 14:1178630220915688, PMID: 32341651, 10.1177/1178630220915688. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarWorld Bank. 2022. Population estimates and projections. Metadata last updated 28 April 2022. https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/search/dataset/0037655 [accessed 17 January 2022]. Google ScholarS.D.A. is funded by the National Institutes of Aging to conduct research in the Longitudinal Aging Study of India. Both S.D.A. and P.P. have participated in the Collaborative for Air Pollution and Health Effects Research–India. P.P. is employed by the Health Effects Institute, which receives funding from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the worldwide motor vehicle industry, as well as philanthropic organizations. The views expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Health Effects Institute or its sponsors.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsRelated articlesMortality Associated with Ambient PM2.5 Exposure in India: Results from the Million Death Study14 September 2022Environmental Health Perspectives Vol. 130, No. 9 September 2022Metrics About Article Metrics Publication History Manuscript received19 January 2022Manuscript revised13 May 2022Manuscript accepted3 August 2022Originally published14 September 2022 Financial disclosuresPDF download License information EHP is an open-access journal published with support from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health. All content is public domain unless otherwise noted. Note to readers with disabilities EHP strives to ensure that all journal content is accessible to all readers. However, some figures and Supplemental Material published in EHP articles may not conform to 508 standards due to the complexity of the information being presented. If you need assistance accessing journal content, please contact [email protected]. Our staff will work with you to assess and meet your accessibility needs within 3 working days.