[Prognostic ability of seminal plasma lipidomic analysis in predicting the success of microTESE in men with azoospermia].

INTRODUCTION:The aim of this work is to assess the possibility of metabolomic (specifically lipidomic) analysis of seminal plasma to identify patients with preserved focal spermatogenesis in the testes who may have a reasonable chance of sperm retrieval during the microTESE procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS:lipid composition of semen plasma samples from 64 men with azoospermia and 24 fertile control men was analyzed. Lipids were isolated from semen by a modified Folch extraction method. Lipid extracts were analyzed by reverse phase liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Lipidomic data were compared with the results of the microTESE procedure. RESULTS:Comparison of two groups revealed a statistically significant difference in concentration for 23 lipids detected in positive ion mode and 37 lipids detected in negative ion mode. Those lipids mainly belong to hexosylceramides, sphingomyelins and phosphatidylcholines, phosphatidylethanolamines and their ethers. In multivariate analysis content of SM d16: 1/18:0 lipid (beta coefficient: -7.23; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: -11.93 to - 2.53; odds ratio: 7.23e-04; CI for odds ratio: 6.59e-06 to 7.93e-02; Walds test: -3.02; p=0.003), content of TG 14: 1_16 : 0_18: 3 lipid (beta 2.95; 95% CI 0.98 to 4.93; odds ratio: 1.92e + 01; CI for odds ratio: 2.66e + 00 to 1.39e + 02 ; Walds test: 2.93; p=0.003) and testicular volume (beta: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.04 to 2.45; odds ratio: 1.15e + 00; CI odds ratio: from 1.04e + 00 to 1.27e + 00; Walds test: 2.65; p=0.008) were significantly associated with positive MicroTESE outcome. The sensitivity of this regression model was 61%, the specificity was 83%, and the AUC was 0.75. CONCLUSIONS:seminal plasma serves as a rich source of biological markers for identifying patients with preserved focal spermatogenesis in the testes. Seminal plasma lipidomic profile of the of patients in the control group with normal spermatogenesis clearly differs from the profile of patients with azoospermia, also there was a significant difference in content of a difference in lipids between patients with positive and negative microTESE outcomes. These are preliminary results and further research is needed to confirm the validity of the resulting lipid panel.