Comparison of 10-2 and 24-2 Perimetry to Diagnose Glaucoma Using OCT as an Independent Reference Standard.

PURPOSE:To compare the performance of the 10-2 test versus 24-2 standard automated perimetry (SAP) test for the diagnosis of glaucoma using OCT as an independent standard for glaucomatous damage. DESIGN:Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS:A total of 1375 pairs of 10-2 and 24-2 SAP tests from 569 eyes of 339 subjects were used for the analysis. A total of 440 (77%) eyes had a diagnosis of glaucoma, and 129 (23%) eyes were normal. All participants underwent 10-2 and 24-2 SAP tests within 30 days. METHODS:Glaucomatous severity was quantified based on OCT macula ganglion cell layer (mGCL) and circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was used to compare 10-2 and 24-2 metrics for discriminating healthy eyes from those of glaucoma, at different levels of disease severity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Areas under the ROC curves and sensitivities at fixed specificities of 80% and 95%. RESULTS:The overall AUC for mean deviation (MD) for the 24-2 test (0.808) was significantly higher than that of the 10-2 test (0.742; P < 0.001). When compared at different stages of the disease, the 24-2 test performed generally better than the 10-2 test, notably in the earlier stages of the disease. For early damage (first quartile), the 24-2 MD had an AUC of 0.658 versus 0.590 for 10-2 MD (P = 0.018). For advanced damage (fourth quartile), corresponding values were 0.954 vs. 0.903 (P = 0.013). Similar trends were observed when glaucoma severity was defined based on structural macular damage with mGCL thickness. CONCLUSIONS:The 24-2 SAP test had better diagnostic accuracy compared with that of the 10-2 test for detecting equivalent levels of glaucomatous damage, as measured by quantitative assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer and macula by OCT. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S):Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.