Field management changes the distribution of mesoplastic and macroplastic in Mollisols of Northeast China

Mesoplastic (MaP) and macroplastic (MeP) coming from plastic mulching tend to cause negative effects on biota in ecosystems. However, it is still not clear how field management influences the distribution of MeP/MaP in soils. In this study, MeP/MaP was investigated in 0–20 and 20–30 cm soil layers of three vegetable fields (3.4–6.5 ha) after 13 years plastic-mulching in Mollisols of Northeast China under different management methods (MM) of fertilization and tillage frequency. The tillage frequency was MM2 > MM1 > MM3, while the fertilization was MM1 > MM2 > MM3. The results showed that polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene, polyvinyl chloride, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyamide, melamine-formaldehyde resin and polyether urethane were found in soil, and PE (>83.76%, from plastic mulching) was the predominant type of MeP/MaP. MeP abundance was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in MM1 and MM2 than that in MM3 in the 0–20 cm soil layer. MM1 and MM2 had the highest abundance of MeP/MaP of size <4 cm2 and 4–16 cm2, while MM3 had the highest abundance at the size >16 cm2. The broken index of MeP/MaP was significantly (p < 0.05) lower in MM2 compared with MM1 and MM3 in the 20–30 cm soil layer. Both tillage frequency and fertilization accelerate the breaking of plastics, especially since the influence was stronger from fertilization. Compared with original plastics, the PE, PP and PET's carbonyl index was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in the three MMs. Generally, fertilization and frequent tillage can reduce the physical effects of large-sized plastic debris on crop growth and increases the negative effects of small-sized plastic and new pollutants formed on biota in the agroecosystems. MeP/MaP recycling should be strengthened, and the irrigation and rotation of farmland should be carried out when the wind speed is weak to avoid plastic invasion.