Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

Quantum correlations on the no-signaling boundary: self-testing and more

QUANTUM(2022)

Cited 1|Views11
No score
Abstract
In device-independent quantum information, correlations between local measurement outcomes observed by spatially separated parties in a Bell test play a fundamental role. Even though it is long-known that the set of correlations allowed in quantum theory lies strictly between the Bell-local set and the no-signaling set, many questions concerning the geometry of the quantum set remain unanswered. Here, we revisit the problem of when the boundary of the quantum set coincides with the no-signaling set in the simplest Bell scenario. In particular, we prove that self-testing is possible in nontrivial classes of these common boundaries beyond the known examples of Hardy-type correlations and provide numerical evidence supporting the robustness of these self-testing results. As a byproduct, we also show that if the qubit strategies leading to an extremal nonlocal correlation are local-unitarily equivalent, a self-testing statement based on this correlation follows. Interestingly, all these self-testing correlations found on the no-signaling boundary are provably non-exposed. An analogous characterization for the set $\mathcal{M}$ of quantum correlations arising from finite-dimensional maximally entangled states is also provided. En route to establishing this last result, we show that all correlations of $\mathcal{M}$ in the simplest Bell scenario are attainable as convex combinations of those achievable using a Bell pair and projective measurements. In turn, we obtain the maximal Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt Bell inequality violation by any maximally entangled two-qudit state and a no-go theorem regarding the self-testing of such states.
More
Translated text
Key words
quantum correlations,no-signaling,self-testing
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined