Biomechanical and Histological Results of Dual-Suspensory Reconstruction Using Banded Tendon Graft to Bridge Massive Rotator Cuff Tears in a Chronic Rabbit Model

Background: Bridging rotator cuff tendon defects with a patch is a reasonable treatment for massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs). However, the poor outcomes associated with routine patch repair have prompted exploration into superior bridging techniques and graft structures. Purpose: To detect whether dual-suspensory reconstruction using a banded graft would be superior to routine bridging using a patch graft to treat MRCTs and to detect the comparative effectiveness of patellar tendon (PT) and fascia lata (FL) grafts in dual-suspensory reconstruction. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Unilateral chronic MRCTs were created in 72 mature male New Zealand White rabbits, which were randomly divided into 3 groups: (1) patch bridging repair using rectangular FL autograft (PR-FL), (2) dual-suspensory bridging reconstruction using banded FL autograft (DSR-FL), and (3) dual-suspensory bridging reconstruction using banded PT autograft (DSR-PT). In each group, the mean failure load and stiffness of the cuff-graft-humerus (C-G-H) complexes of 6-week and 12-week specimens were recorded, with the failure modes and sites noted. Moreover, cuff-to-graft and graft-to-bone interface healing and graft substance remodeling of the complexes were histologically evaluated (via hematoxylin and eosin, Picrosirius red, Masson trichrome, and Safranin O/fast green staining) at 6 and 12 weeks to assess integrations between the bridging constructs and the native bone or rotator cuff tendons. Results: The DSR-PT group had the greatest mean failure loads and stiffness of the C-G-H complexes at 6 and 12 weeks (41.81 +/- 7.00 N, 10.34 +/- 2.68 N/mm; 87.62 +/- 9.20 N, 17.98 +/- 1.57 N/mm, respectively), followed by the DSR-FL group (32.04 +/- 5.49 N, 8.20 +/- 2.27 N/mm; 75.30 +/- 7.31 N, 14.39 +/- 3.29 N/mm, respectively). In the DSR-PT and DSR-FL groups, fewer specimens failed at the graft-to-bone junction and more failed at the cuff-to-graft junction, but both groups had higher median failure loads at 6 and 12 weeks (DSR-PT: cuff-to-graft junction, 37.80 and 83.76 N; graft-to-bone junction, 45.46 and 95.86 N) (DSR-FL: cuff-to-graft junction, 28.52 and 67.68 N; graft-to-bone junction, 37.92 and 82.18 N) compared with PR-FL (cuff-to-graft junction, 27.17 and 60.04 N; graft-to-bone junction, 30.12 and 55.95 N). At 12 weeks, the DSR-FL group had higher median failure loads at graft substance (72.26 N) than the PR-FL group (61.27 N). Moreover, the PR-FL group showed more inflammatory responses at the 2 healing interfaces and the graft substance in the 6-week specimens and subsequently displayed poorer interface healing (assessed via collagen organization, collagen maturity, and fibrocartilage regeneration) and graft substance remodeling (assessed via collagen organization and maturity) in 12-week specimens compared with the DSR-PT and DSR-FL groups. Superior interface healing and substance remodeling processes were observed in the DSR-PT group compared with the DSR-FL group. Conclusion: When compared with routine patch repair, the dual-suspensory reconstructions optimized biomechanical properties and improved interface healing and graft substance remodeling for bridging MRCTs. Furthermore, the dual-suspensory technique using the PT graft presented superior histological and biomechanical characteristics than that using FL.