Gonadotropin receptor polymorphisms (FSHR N680S and LHCGR N312S) are not predictive of clinical outcome and live birth in assisted reproductive technology.

OBJECTIVE:To study the consequences of specific genotype profiles of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) and luteinizing hormone choriogonadotropin receptor (LHCGR) on assisted reproductive technology outcomes when preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is used for controlling the embryo ploidy status. The most common reported single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the amino acid position for the FSHR (N680S; N: asparagine, S: serine; [rs6166]) and the LHCGR (N312S variant; N: asparagine, S: serine [rs2293275]) were chosen for this study. DESIGN:Retrospective cohort study. SETTING:Private Fertility Clinic. PATIENT(S):All women aged 18-40 years undergoing their first assisted reproductive technology cycle with aneuploidy screening between 2006 and 2017 with body mass index of >18 and <40 kg/m2 were included. INTERVENTION(S):All patients received both recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and human menopausal gonadotropin or low dose human chorionic gonadotropin. Genomic DNA was isolated from patients' blood. Genotyping of the FSHR and LHCGR polymorphisms was performed using TaqMan genotyping assays. Associations between both receptor genotypes and clinical outcomes were assessed using generalized regression and ANOVA. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE(S):Live birth rate was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included oocyte yield, mature oocytes, blastulation rate, usable blastocyst rate, and implantation rate. RESULT(S):A total of 1,183 patients met the inclusion criteria and generated reliable genotype results. The overall genotype frequencies in the study population for the FSHR gene were as follows: 21.7% homozygous for S in codon 680, 29.2% homozygous for N680, and 48.1% heterozygous (N680S). As for the LHCGR, 15.6% were homozygous for N312, 38.5% homozygous for S312 and 45.9% heterozygous (N312S). Our study population consisted of 53.8% non-Hispanic white; 6.1% Hispanic white; 4.1% Afro-American; 15.4% Asian; and 20.6% other or unknown. No significant association was found with any of the studied variables (oocyte yield, usable blastocyst rate, implantation rate, live birth) when genotypes were analyzed per receptor or in combination with one another. There was a statistically significant but clinically irrelevant difference in the rate of mature oocytes across different variant combinations. CONCLUSION(S):Our findings suggest that the presence of gonadotropin receptor polymorphisms in both FSHR N680S and LHCGR N312S are not associated with assisted reproductive technology outcomes; therefore, these variants should not be considered reproductive predictors.