Comparison of the efficacy of two alveolar recruitment manoeuvres in improving the lung mechanics and the degree of atelectasis in anaesthetized healthy sheep

The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether the application of two types of alveolar recruitment manoeuvres (ARMs) followed by a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) improved lung mechanics and the degree of atelectasis caused by general anaesthesia. Twenty-one female Merino sheep were divided into three groups: sustained inflation ARM (ARMsust), stepwise ARM (AMRstep), and control (without ARM). Sheep received detomidine-morphine for premedication, propofol for induction, and isoflurane during general anaesthesia in a volume-controlled mode with 100% oxygen during the first 15 min of anaesthesia and 40% the rest of the study. The right jugular vein and metacarpal artery were catheterised for mixed venous and arterial blood sample collection, respectively. The quasistatic compliance (Cqst), oxygenation parameters, and shunt fraction (Qs/Qt) were monitored before ARM application (TpreARM), and at 10 (T10) and 60 min (T60) after ARM application. A pulmonary histopathological study was conducted on five animals from each group. A significant increase in Cqst was observed in both ARM groups at T10 compared to TpreARM (ARMsust: P = 0.001; ARMstep: P = 0.002), although only the ARMsust group showed significant differences compared to the control group. The ARMstep group presented a significant improvement in oxygenation parameters and Qs/Qt fraction (T10: 4.84 (3.26–16.48)%, P = 0.048; T60: 4.40 (4.31–14.16)%, P = 0.004) compared with TpreARM (21.48 (20.61–28.32)%). The ARMstep group had the highest percentage of alveolar area and the most homogeneous values. In conclusion, the application of a stepwise ARM followed by PEEP improved atelectasis caused by isoflurane anaesthesia in healthy sheep.