How Prenatal Head Ultrasound Reference Ranges Affect Evaluation Of Possible Fetal Microcephaly

JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE(2021)

Cited 0|Views27
No score
Abstract
Objectives: Different fetal ultrasound (US) nomograms of the head circumference (HC) have been established; however, comparisons between the detection rates of microcephaly among US nomograms are few and inconsistent. We aimed to compare the prenatal diagnostic rate of fetal microcephaly (FM) among four widely used US nomograms of the fetal HC, when applied to the same group of fetuses. Methods: We retrospectively identified singleton pregnancies complicated by fetal HC < 5th percentile for gestational age (GA) by US, without other risk factors for FM and with normal fetal brain MRI. Raw values of HC by US were converted to z-scores using four nomograms (Chervenak = A, Hadlock = B, Gelber = C, Papageorghiou = D). Z-scores value of the HC were classified as normal, possible normal, or microcephaly if values were >?2, ? ?2 and >?3, or ? ?3, respectively and compared among the four nomograms. Results: Fifty one fetuses at a mean (?SD) GA of 28 (?4) weeks were included. The four nomograms resulted in different z-score values of the fetal HC for the same subject (p?More
Translated text
Key words
Fetal head circumference, fetal microcephaly, normal ultrasound reference range, prenatal ultrasound, z-scores
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined