How does anisotropy control rock slope deformation? A discrete element modelling investigation

<p>Deep-seated failures of rock slopes are partly controlled by structural, lithological and topographical factors. Among structural factors, layering, schistosity and foliation in rock material, which could be described as inherent anisotropy of the material, affect initiation and evolution of deep-seated rock slope <span>deformation</span>, especially in slow moving landslides.</p><p>In order to document such an influence of material anisotropy on slope stability, we carry out a parametric study using discrete element modelling (DEM). After a validation exercise for fully isotropic material, where we compare our numerical approach to an analytical slope stability solution, we introduce anisotropy (transverse isotropy) in our DEM model by inserting preferentially oriented and weakened bonds between discrete elements (weakness plane) to simulate two typical transverse isotropic lithologies, claystone and gneiss respectively. Considering these two lithologies, we then explore the influence of the weakness plane&#8217;s orientation with respect to the slope angle for both ridge and valley geometries.</p><p>We show that certain orientations of the weakness plane relative to the topographic slope favour deep-seated deformation. We also observe significant disparities in failure initiation, failure surface localisation, and mobilized volume depending on the <span>weakness plane</span> orientation. For instance, most unstable slopes occur when the weakness plane rises 10&#176; to 30&#176; less than the hillslope angle. These instabilities are associated with well-localized deformation at depth that when intersecting the surface mimic some of the morphological features (such as counter-slope scarps) that are commonly described along mountain ridges in association with <span>slow-moving and deep-seated rock slope failures</span>.</p><p>Our results help explain the appearance or absence of deep-seated failure in mountainous areas and allow to better assess slope failure hazard induced by anisotropic rock strength.</p>